2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2018.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microaggregate stability and storage of organic carbon is affected by clay content in arable Luvisols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Means with the same letter in the same isolation method and size fractions were not significantly different. Data of the wet‐sieved free and wet‐sieved occluded fractions adapted from Krause et al (2018) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Means with the same letter in the same isolation method and size fractions were not significantly different. Data of the wet‐sieved free and wet‐sieved occluded fractions adapted from Krause et al (2018) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were taken at clay contents of 19, 24 and 34% ( n = 5 each). More detailed information on the sampling of the toposequence can be found in Krause et al (2018). Briefly, the top 5–20 cm were sampled in late 2015 in a field‐fresh state (water content approximately 16 wt% or 21 vol.%), sieved to <8 mm and stored at 4°C until further processing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results showed that the site with the highest clay content of 29% (Tänikon) required a stronger dispersion with ultrasonication than the other sites to achieve fractions with better isolation of C3-and C4-derived organic carbon. Clay particles tend to form very stable microaggregates (52)(53)(54) and increase the proportion of macro-aggregates in the soil (54,55). These macroaggregates obviously resisted weaker dispersion methods with H 2 O and glass beads (19, 31).…”
Section: Discussion Isolation Efficiencies Of Dispersion Methods Are Related To Soil Texturementioning
confidence: 99%