Microbial activity, community structure and potassium dynamics in rhizosphere soil of soybean plants treated with glyphosate

Lane, Matthew; Lorenz, Nicola; Saxena, Jyotisna; Ramsier, Cliff; Dick, Richard P.

doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2011.12.005

Cited by 32 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Barriuso et al (2011) showed that glyphosate treatments applied on GMHT maize during the 3-year period of seasonal cultivation in two different fields did not significantly change the maize rhizobacterial communities when compared with those of the untreated soil. These and other studies indicate that one single application of glyphosate has only small and transient effects on the soil microbial community (Motavalli et al, 2004;Gomez et al, 2009;Barriuso et al, 2010Barriuso et al, , 2011Barriuso and Mellado, 2012), if they occur, and that its repeated use may favour soil microorganisms capable of metabolising or which are tolerant to glyphosate (Lancaster et al, 2009;Lane et al, 2011;Zabaloy et al, 2012).…”

Section: Impact On Soil Microbial Communitiesmentioning

confidence: 65%

“…Frequent applications of glyphosate may thus directly or indirectly induce deficiencies in micro-and macro-nutrients (Bott et al, 2008(Bott et al, , 2011Zobiolo et al, 2010b), requiring altered fertiliser applications. However, Lane et al (2011) reported that glyphosate applications did not reduce the plant available potassium (soil exchangeable or plant tissue potassium) in GMHT soybean.…”

Section: Impact On Soil Microbial Communitiesmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Scientific Opinion on an application (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2005‐24) for the placing on the market of the herbicide tolerant genetically modified soybean 40‐3‐2 for cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto

2012

EFS2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This Scientific Opinion reports on an evaluation of a risk assessment for the placing on the market for cultivation of genetically modified soybean 40‐3‐2, and updates the previous EFSA GMO Panel Scientific Opinion on the renewal applications for the continued marketing of soybean 40‐3‐2. The EFSA GMO Panel considered that soybean 40‐3‐2 is unlikely to raise additional environmental safety concerns compared with conventional soybean, but that the management of its cultivation could result in environmental harm under certain conditions. The Panel therefore recommended managing the use of glyphosate on soybean 40‐3‐2 in ways that result in similar or reduced environmental impacts compared with conventional soybean cultivation. There is no evidence of adverse effects on non‐target organisms (including pollinators) due to the expression of the CP4 EPSPS protein, and there are no indications of the occurrence of adverse effects on non‐target predators, herbivores and decomposers due to potential unintended changes in soybean 40‐3‐2. Owing to the lack of event‐specific data on plant‐pollinator interactions, scientific uncertainty on the occurrence of adverse effects on pollinators, due to potential unintended changes in soybean 40‐3‐2, remains, and strategies for resolving this uncertainty are discussed. The Panel recommended the deployment of case‐specific monitoring to address: (1) changes in weed community diversity; and (2) the evolution of resistance to glyphosate in weeds due to changes in herbicide and cutivation regimes. The Panel agreed with the general surveillance plan of the applicant, but requested that the Panel's proposals to strengthen general surveillance are implemented. The Panel concluded that the information available for soybean 40‐3‐2 addresses the scientific comments raised by Member States and that soybean 40‐3‐2, as described in this application, is as safe as its conventional counterpart and commercial non‐GM soybean varieties with respect to potential adverse effects on human and animal health. If subjected to appropriate management measures, the cultivation of soybean 40‐3‐2 is unlikely to have environmental effects any more adverse than those associated with conventional soybean cultivation.

show abstract

Section: Impact On Soil Microbial Communitiesmentioning

confidence: 65%

Section: Impact On Soil Microbial Communitiesmentioning

confidence: 98%

Scientific Opinion on an application (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2005‐24) for the placing on the market of the herbicide tolerant genetically modified soybean 40‐3‐2 for cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto

2012

EFS2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Contrarily, there are also reports revealing a reduction in the level of available copper, manganese and zinc by the application of insecticides, fungicides and herbicides in soil (Pal et al, 1979;Lane et al, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of pesticides on available cationic micronutrients along with viable bacteria and fungi in soil

Paul¹,

N²,

Sur³

et al. 2013

Afr. J. Microbiol. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The results are varied, with direct or indirect effects, null (Zilli et al 2008;Nakatani et al 2014) or negative effects Lane et al 2012), depending on the products and their physical and chemical properties, dosage, type of application, and time after application. However, there are few reports on the microbial activity of soils contaminated with herbicides, and in particular with sulfentrazone, submitted to bio-remediation.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Microbial activity of soil with sulfentrazone associated with phytoremediator species and inoculation with a bacterial consortium

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Microbial activity, community structure and potassium dynamics in rhizosphere soil of soybean plants treated with glyphosate

Cited by 32 publications

References 27 publications

Scientific Opinion on an application (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2005‐24) for the placing on the market of the herbicide tolerant genetically modified soybean 40‐3‐2 for cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto

Scientific Opinion on an application (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2005‐24) for the placing on the market of the herbicide tolerant genetically modified soybean 40‐3‐2 for cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto

Effect of pesticides on available cationic micronutrients along with viable bacteria and fungi in soil

Microbial activity of soil with sulfentrazone associated with phytoremediator species and inoculation with a bacterial consortium

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About