2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial assimilation dynamics differs but total mineralization from added root and shoot residues is similar in agricultural Alfisols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The elevated organic substrate and nutrients provided by manure and chemical fertilizers in the fertilization soil eliminate the C and P (the primary limiting nutrient for fungi) limitation, and accelerate the growth of fungi 14 . Besides, large amounts of maize root residues remaining in the fertilization treatment could also contribute to the reproduction of saprophytic populations, because of the predominant role of saprophytic fungi in decomposing cellulose and lignin, the primary components of maize residue 63 . However, it is worthy to mention that, although long-term fertilization increased the F/B ratio, the GluN/MurA ratio did not show significant differences between control and fertilization treatments in bulk soil (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elevated organic substrate and nutrients provided by manure and chemical fertilizers in the fertilization soil eliminate the C and P (the primary limiting nutrient for fungi) limitation, and accelerate the growth of fungi 14 . Besides, large amounts of maize root residues remaining in the fertilization treatment could also contribute to the reproduction of saprophytic populations, because of the predominant role of saprophytic fungi in decomposing cellulose and lignin, the primary components of maize residue 63 . However, it is worthy to mention that, although long-term fertilization increased the F/B ratio, the GluN/MurA ratio did not show significant differences between control and fertilization treatments in bulk soil (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the duration of the effect of DOC addition on microbial biomass was different from other carbon sources. For example, the addition of glucose may cause an increase in microbial biomass in 1-2 days (20,21), while with the addition of litter, microbial biomass usually reaches its maximum after a few months (22,23). The observed duration and magnitude of the increase of microbial biomass probably depend on the quality and quantity of added C. Previous studies found that if the quantity of addition active carbon was less than native soil microbial biomass C, it only increased microbial activity but did not cause the increase of microbial biomass (55).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a key natural component of forest carbon cycle, plant-derived DOC is more complex than simple organic substances and includes a rapidly decomposable fraction and a slowly decomposable fraction (17,18), and the addition of litter-derived DOC might affect the microbial biomass and extracellular enzyme activity as well as causing a possible shift in the microbial community composition (19). Previous studies proved that glucose addition caused an increase in microbial biomass in 1-2 days (20,21), while litter addition caused the maximum increase of microbial biomass in a few months (22,23). Recent research showed that the proportion of added litter-derived C entering soil microbial groups nearly disappeared after 18 months (1-2 years), indicating little long-term utilization of litter-derived C by soil microorganisms (16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fertile soil conditions are directly evident from the abundance of earthworms. High nutrient availability is also indicated by the increased population and activity of soil microbes in the decomposition process of soil organic matter [10]. Therefore, adding biological indicators in the modified method is hoped to ensure a better soil fertility evaluation closer to reality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%