2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1997.tb00380.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial community structure in gastrointestinal tracts of domestic animals: comparative analyses using rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes

Abstract: The microbial community structure of the gastrointestinal (GI) tracts of various domestic animals (bovine, ovine, caprine, and swine) was evaluated using oligonucleotide probes targeting the small subunit (SSU) ribosomal RNA (rRNA) of major microbial groups. Bacterial, eukaryotic, and archaeal rRNAs were estimated to account for approximately 60–90%, 3–30% and 0.5–3%, respectively, of the total rRNA present in the GI tracts of most of the animals examined in this study. The abundance of phylogenetically define… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
37
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Such marked differences between these two studies are also likely to be explained, in part, by animal species and diet. Lin et al (1997) targeting the small subunit ribosomal RNA through oligonucleotide probes demonstrated that animal species and diet affected the quantity and dominance of methanogens in the rumen. The molecular diversity of methanogens also confirmed this (Wright et al, 2004 and.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such marked differences between these two studies are also likely to be explained, in part, by animal species and diet. Lin et al (1997) targeting the small subunit ribosomal RNA through oligonucleotide probes demonstrated that animal species and diet affected the quantity and dominance of methanogens in the rumen. The molecular diversity of methanogens also confirmed this (Wright et al, 2004 and.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methanogenic archaea are ubiquitous in anoxic environments and require an extremely low redox potential to grow. They can be found both in moderate habitats such as rice paddies (Grosskopf et al 1998a,b), lakes (Jürgens et al 2000, Keough et al 2003) and lake sediments (Chan et al 2005), as well as in the gastrointestinal tract of animals (Lin et al 1997) and in extreme habitats such as hydrothermal vents (Jeanthon et al 1999), hypersaline habitats (Mathrani & Boone 1995) and permafrost soils (Kobabe et al 2004, Ganzert et al 2006. Rates of methane production and consumption in sediments are controlled by the relative availability of substrates for methanogenesis (especially acetate or hydrogen and carbon dioxide).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), as described by Pers-Kamczyc et al (2011), was used to quantify the methanogen population. The specific oligonucleotide probe (TibMolBiol, Poznań, Poland) was designed for all methanogens (Lin et al, 1997) and was complementary to 16S rRNA. Hybridization was done at 37°C in a hybridization buffer containing 0.9 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 38% formamide, and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) with 50 ng/well fluorescent dye Cy3 at the 5' end of the oligonucleotide probe.…”
Section: Quantification Of the Microbial Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%