Microbial Community Structure in Midgut and Hindgut of the Humus-Feeding Larva of Pachnoda ephippiata (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)

Abstract

The guts of soil-feeding macroinvertebrates contain a complex microbial community that is involved in the transformation of ingested soil organic matter. In a companion paper (T. Lemke, U. Stingl, M. Egert, M. W. Friedrich, and A. Brune, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:6650-6658, 2003), we show that the gut of our model organism, the humivorous larva of the cetoniid beetle Pachnoda ephippiata, is characterized by strong midgut alkalinity, high concentrations of microbial fermentation products, and the presence of a diverse, yet unstudied microbial community. Here, we report on the community structure of bacteria and archaea in the midgut, hindgut, and food soil of P. ephippiata larvae, determined with cultivation-independent techniques. Clone libraries and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of 16S rRNA genes revealed that the intestines of P. ephippiata larvae contain a complex gut microbiota that differs markedly between midgut and hindgut and that is clearly distinct from the microbiota in the food soil. The bacterial community is dominated by phylogenetic groups with a fermentative metabolism (Lactobacillales, Clostridiales, Bacillales, and CytophagaFlavobacterium-Bacteroides [CFB] phylum), which is corroborated by high lactate and acetate concentrations in the midgut and hindgut and by the large numbers of lactogenic and acetogenic bacteria in both gut compartments reported in the companion paper. Based on 16S rRNA gene frequencies, Actinobacteria dominate the alkaline midgut, while the hindgut is dominated by members of the CFB phylum. The archaeal community, however, is less diverse. 16S rRNA genes affiliated with mesophilic Crenarchaeota, probably stemming from the ingested soil, were most frequent in the midgut, whereas Methanobacteriaceae-related 16S rRNA genes were most frequent in the hindgut. These findings agree with the reported restriction of methanogenesis to the hindgut of Pachnoda larvae.

Community Structure of the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Microbiota: Seasonal and Spatial Sources of Variation

“…Most of the data obtained on insect gut bacterial diversity is derived from traditional microbial methods such as viable plate counts and phenetic taxonomy. However, in recent years the use of the rRNA approach enables further characterization of the enteric microbiota of many insects (Egert et al, 2003;Reeson et al, 2003;Dillon and Dillon, 2004;Behar et al, 2005;Capuzzo et al, 2005;Mohr and Tebbe, 2006).…”

The Microbiome of Spodoptera littoralis: Development, Control and Adaptation to the Insect Host

“…The high alkaline pH in the gut of lepidopteran insects could kill many microorganisms. However, alkaline conditions favor the dominance of Firmicutesrelated bacteria in the midgut of the beetle Pachnoda ephippiata [134]. Both culture-dependent and culture-independent methods have detected the presence of Enterococcus in the alkaline midgut of the gypsy moth larva [135].…”

Entomophagy: A Viable Opportunity for Food Security

“…GHGs production per kg of mass gain from three insect species such as mealworm larvae, crickets and locusts studied by Oonincx et al, (2010), revealed that all three insect species produce less GHGs as well as ammonia compared to per kg of mass gain from pigs and beef cattle. Insect species such as termites, cockroaches and scarab beetles produce methane due to the bacterial fermentation (Hackstein and Stumm, 1994;Egert et al, 2003). However insect species such as mealworms, crickets and grasshoppers which are economically suitable for mass production has less GHGs production characters remains the viable options for producing alternate food source.…”