2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.04.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial content of house dust samples determined with qPCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
61
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present investigation has shown that dust samples collected from carpets contained several types of bacteria including S. aureus, S. epidermidis, Gram negative bacilli, and other types of molds such as Asperigillus and Penicillum spp. and others which is in agreement with the findings by other researchers [27]. It has also been reported that aerosolization of carpet dust can be a source to spread other pathogenic bacteria such as Salmonella and Clostridium botulinum [28].…”
Section: IVsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results of the present investigation has shown that dust samples collected from carpets contained several types of bacteria including S. aureus, S. epidermidis, Gram negative bacilli, and other types of molds such as Asperigillus and Penicillum spp. and others which is in agreement with the findings by other researchers [27]. It has also been reported that aerosolization of carpet dust can be a source to spread other pathogenic bacteria such as Salmonella and Clostridium botulinum [28].…”
Section: IVsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…(Myco). These were analyzed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) techniques [7]. Allergen levels were determined using two-site sandwich ELISA for house dust mite (Der p1, Der f1), cat (Fel d1), dog (Can f1) while horse allergen (Equ cx) was measured using monoclonal antibodies [8] [9].…”
Section: Microbiology and Allergensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The six fungal species were chosen because they are commonly found in homes and are known for their allergic and/or toxic effects (Chew et al, 2003;Huttunen et al, 2004;Kaarakainen et al, 2009;Kuhn and Ghannoum, 2003;Meklin et al, 2004). Mycobacteria and Streptomyces were selected for their allergic and inflammatory strength (Huttunen et al, 2004;Obihara et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%