2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2022.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial | electrochemical CO2 reduction: To integrate or not to integrate?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrochemical reduction of CO 2 (CO 2 RR) to formate is not possible at plain graphite electrodes as used here. [45][46][47] Furthermore, formate was not generated in abiotic electrochemical cell with the same carbon cathodes when 200 mM KCl was used as the electrolyte solution (Fig. S4 †).…”
Section: Abiotic Electrochemical Performancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The electrochemical reduction of CO 2 (CO 2 RR) to formate is not possible at plain graphite electrodes as used here. [45][46][47] Furthermore, formate was not generated in abiotic electrochemical cell with the same carbon cathodes when 200 mM KCl was used as the electrolyte solution (Fig. S4 †).…”
Section: Abiotic Electrochemical Performancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…This concept of MES is also denominated as a primary microbial electrochemical technology (MET) and has to be distinguished from approaches using a secondary MET. Secondary MET approaches are based on abiotic electrocatalysis and indirectly connected to microbial synthesis, for example, by the electrochemical generation of feedstock (see above) (Izadi & Harnisch, 2022; Schröder et al, 2015). For MES in primary MET, the GDE design aims to allow sufficient supply of CO 2 for the microorganisms.…”
Section: Conversion Of Co2 At Gde Using Microbial Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[95] The integration of eCO 2 RR with microbial synthesis can become economically competitive with appropriate reactors and product diversity. [96] The electrochemical co-reduction of nitrogen oxide (NO x ) and CO 2 can selectively produce urea on In(OH) 3 (Figure 8c) [88] and TeÀ Pd NCs, [97] and methylamine on CoPc-NH 2 -CNT (Figure 8d). [98] Owing to the nucleophilic attack of the energetically more favorable amine on a ketene intermediate (*C=C=O) generated by the electrochemical CO reduction reaction on commercial Cu catalysts, amides can be formed with good selectivity at an industrially relevant reaction rate (Figure 8d).…”
Section: Co-reactantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microbes accepting reducing equivalents from electrodes can transform CO 2 into high‐value C 2+ products (Figure 8b), such as acetate, [87, 92] butyrate, [93] isobutanol and 3‐methyl‐1‐butanol, [94] and butyrate [95] . The integration of eCO 2 RR with microbial synthesis can become economically competitive with appropriate reactors and product diversity [96] . The electrochemical co‐reduction of nitrogen oxide (NO x ) and CO 2 can selectively produce urea on In(OH) 3 (Figure 8c) [88] and Te−Pd NCs, [97] and methylamine on CoPc‐NH 2 ‐CNT (Figure 8d) [98] .…”
Section: Co‐reactantsmentioning
confidence: 99%