2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial fuel cell energy harvesting using synchronous flyback converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The external power supply was replaced with a small 6.7 mF capacitor that harvested sufficient energy to run continuously the microcontroller for switching and voltage monitoring. However according to previous studies describing the development of MPPT active harvesters, it was deemed best to substitute all latching relays with transistors; 39,40 metal-oxide-semiconductor-fieldeffect-transistors (MOSFET) that consumed 1000-times less energy compared to a latching relay (∼30 μJ each).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The external power supply was replaced with a small 6.7 mF capacitor that harvested sufficient energy to run continuously the microcontroller for switching and voltage monitoring. However according to previous studies describing the development of MPPT active harvesters, it was deemed best to substitute all latching relays with transistors; 39,40 metal-oxide-semiconductor-fieldeffect-transistors (MOSFET) that consumed 1000-times less energy compared to a latching relay (∼30 μJ each).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mio-SMFC PMS stands out as the only self-sustainable system that can operate multiple SMFCs independently to increase the output power. The efficiencies of previous PMSs are estimated by various methods [1][2][3][4]8,10,12,[15][16][17]. For example, in [2] the efficiency of a two-stage PMS is estimated to be 56% by characterizing each stage separately and multiplying the results together; in [3] the specifications from the datasheets of individual components are reported, from which the total efficiency can be estimated at 22%; in [8] the efficiency is claimed to be 45%, but the controller is powered externally and the power loss due to the controller is not considered.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it can be used in remote monitoring applications without requiring maintenance. [1][2][3][4] No Not required; self-sustainable [6] No Required for operation [7] No Required for start-up/restart [8][9][10] No Required for operation [11] No Required for start-up/restart [12][13][14][15][16][17] No Not required; self-sustainable …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4. The discrete component version of hysteresis controller has been used [26], [27]. In this paper, the hysteresis voltage regulator is implemented with a microcontroller so that the internal switching time information can be utilized for MPPT, which can be readily available through the microcontroller's internal counter and comparator interrupt service [28].…”
Section: A Hysteresis Voltage Regulatormentioning
confidence: 99%