2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial Mn(IV) and Fe(III) reduction in northern Barents Sea sediments under different conditions of ice cover and organic carbon deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if our calculations only approximate the true contribution of metals to carbon mineralization, the results indicate that bacterial sulfate reduction is by far the major anaerobic carbon mineralization pathway in these sediments. The prevalence of bacterial sulfate reduction in anaerobic carbon mineralization agrees with results of Vandieken et al (2006) and Nickel et al (2008) from the northern Barents Sea where icefree stations support higher rates of sulfate reduction than the more permanently ice-covered stations, reflecting lower carbon export production.…”
Section: Coupled Terminal Electron-accepting Processessupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even if our calculations only approximate the true contribution of metals to carbon mineralization, the results indicate that bacterial sulfate reduction is by far the major anaerobic carbon mineralization pathway in these sediments. The prevalence of bacterial sulfate reduction in anaerobic carbon mineralization agrees with results of Vandieken et al (2006) and Nickel et al (2008) from the northern Barents Sea where icefree stations support higher rates of sulfate reduction than the more permanently ice-covered stations, reflecting lower carbon export production.…”
Section: Coupled Terminal Electron-accepting Processessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Marine organic carbon is derived from open-water production during the ice-free months, export of ice algae, and new production in polynyas (Sakshaug et al, 2004;Nitishinsky et al 2007). Generally, marine productivity in the Laptev Sea is low and controlled by the nutrients derived from Atlantic water, but spring outflow from the Lena River provides an additional temporary land-derived nutrient source (Pivovarov et al, 1999;Sakshaug et al, 2004;Nitishinsky et al, 2007;Bourgeois et al, 2017) during late spring ice melt (Raymond et al, 2007). Terrestrially derived nutrients can also directly affect marine productivity by new production, or indirectly due to plankton production from remineralized, terrestrially derived dissolved organic carbon and particulate organic carbon Tesi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Marine Versus Terrestrial Organic Matter Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that reason, only two studies, from the Skagerrak and Black Sea, are available for direct comparison on the partitioning of Mn reduction. The process has also been indicated to be of importance in the Panama Basin based on diagenetic modeling (Aller, 1990) and at some Arctic shelf sites where it was, however, not quantified separately from Fe reduction (Vandieken et al, 2006;Nickel et al, 2008). Mn reduction was responsible for over 90 % of total C org oxidation at 600 m depth in the Skagerrak (Canfield et al, 1993b), and accounted for 13-45 % of anaerobic C org oxidation in the Black Sea shelf sites at 60-130 m of water depth .…”
Section: Org Oxidation Dominated By Manganese Reduction In the Ubmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of dissimilatory iron reduction for C org oxidation is well established in the sediments of various continental margins and coastal wetlands Thamdrup and Canfield, 1996;Jensen et al, 2003;Kostka et al, 2002a, b;Vandieken et al, 2006;Hyun et al, 2007Hyun et al, , 2009b. However, only a few locations such as the Panama Basin (Aller, 1990), the coastal Norwegian trough in Skagerrak and an adjacent fjord (Canfield et al, 1993a, b;Vandieken et al, 2014), the Black Sea shelf , and the continental shelf of the northern Barents Sea (Vandieken et al, 2006;Nickel et al, 2008) are known where microbial manganese reduction significantly contributes to carbon mineralization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the concentration of iron in the water depends on the pH value. For instance, when the pH value is higher than 8.5, the equilibrium concentration of Fe 2þ is lower than 0.27 mg/L, as determined by the Fe(OH) 2 ; while at low pH conditions, the anaerobic environment will promote the transformation from Fe 3þ to Fe 2þ in sediment [28,29].…”
Section: Iron Release Of Jinpen Reservoirmentioning
confidence: 98%