Microbial reduction of Fe(III) in the presence of oxygen under low pH conditions

Self Cite

Lakes formed because of coal mining are characterized by low pH and high concentrations of Fe(II) and sulfate. The anoxic sediment is often separated into an upper acidic zone (pH 3; zone I) with large amounts of reactive iron and a deeper slightly acidic zone (pH 5.5; zone III) with smaller amounts of iron. In this study, the impact of pH on the Fe(III)-reducing activities in both of these sediment zones was investigated, and molecular analyses that elucidated the sediment microbial diversity were performed. Fe(II) was formed in zone I and III sediment microcosms at rates that were approximately 710 and 895 nmol cm ؊3 day ؊1 , respectively. A shift to pH 5.3 conditions increased Fe(II) formation in zone I by a factor of 2. A shift to pH 3 conditions inhibited Fe(II) formation in zone III. Clone libraries revealed that the majority of the clones from both zones (approximately 44%) belonged to the Acidobacteria phylum. Since moderately acidophilic Acidobacteria species have the ability to oxidize Fe(II) and since Acidobacterium capsulatum reduced Fe oxides at pHs ranging from 2 to 5, this group appeared to be involved in the cycling of iron. PCR products specific for species related to Acidiphilium revealed that there were higher numbers of phylotypes related to cultured Acidiphilium or Acidisphaera species in zone III than in zone I. From the PCR products obtained for bioleaching-associated bacteria, only one phylotype with a level of similarity to Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans of 99% was obtained. Using primer sets specific for Geobacteraceae, PCR products were obtained in higher DNA dilutions from zone III than from zone I. Phylogenetic analysis of clone libraries obtained from Fe(III)-reducing enrichment cultures grown at pH 5.5 revealed that the majority of clones were closely related to members of the Betaproteobacteria, primarily species of Thiomonas. Our results demonstrated that the upper acidic sediment was inhabited by acidophiles or moderate acidophiles which can also reduce Fe(III) under slightly acidic conditions. The majority of Fe(III) reducers inhabiting the slightly acidic sediment had only minor capacities to be active under acidic conditions.

mentioning

confidence: 99%

pH Gradient-Induced Heterogeneity of Fe(III)-Reducing Microorganisms in Coal Mining-Associated Lake Sediments

Blöthe

Akob

Kostka

et al. 2008

Self Cite

“…We found that the isolates preferred microoxic conditions to reduce Fe(III) and were unable to reduce chelated forms of Fe(III), which is in contrast to the results for the commonly studied neutrophilic Fe(III) reducers. Since other acidophilic Fe(III) reducers have been shown to reduce Fe(III) in the presence of oxygen (41) or even to corespire Fe(III) and oxygen (52), the presence of low oxygen concentrations will not inhibit the reduction of Fe(III) in acidic sediments. Thus, the order of redox processes might differ at the sediment-water interface of acidic ecosystems compared to the order of these processes in neutral-pH sediments, with pH acting as a major driving force in shaping biogeochemical redox processes.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecophysiology of Fe-Cycling Bacteria in Acidic Sediments

Gischkat

Reiche

et al. 2010

143

Using a combination of cultivation-dependent and -independent methods, this study aimed to elucidate the diversity of microorganisms involved in iron cycling and to resolve their in situ functional links in sediments of an acidic lignite mine lake. Using six different media with pH values ranging from 2.5 to 4.3, 117 isolates were obtained that grouped into 38 different strains, including 27 putative new species with respect to the closest characterized strains. Among the isolated strains, 22 strains were able to oxidize Fe(II), 34 were able to reduce Fe(III) in schwertmannite, the dominant iron oxide in this lake, and 21 could do both. All isolates falling into the Gammaproteobacteria (an unknown Dyella-like genus and Acidithiobacillus-related strains) were obtained from the top acidic sediment zones (pH 2.8). Firmicutes strains (related to Bacillus and Alicyclobacillus) were only isolated from deep, moderately acidic sediment zones (pH 4 to 5). Of the Alphaproteobacteria, Acidocellarelated strains were only isolated from acidic zones, whereas Acidiphilium-related strains were isolated from all sediment depths. Bacterial clone libraries generally supported and complemented these patterns. Geobacterrelated clone sequences were only obtained from deep sediment zones, and Geobacter-specific quantitative PCR yielded 8 ؋ 10 5 gene copy numbers. Isolates related to the Acidobacterium, Acidocella, and Alicyclobacillus genera and to the unknown Dyella-like genus showed a broad pH tolerance, ranging from 2.5 to 5.0, and preferred schwertmannite to goethite for Fe(III) reduction. This study highlighted the variety of acidophilic microorganisms that are responsible for iron cycling in acidic environments, extending the results of recent laboratorybased studies that showed this trait to be widespread among acidophiles.

“…Fe(II) formation was measured at selected time intervals (7,22). Dissolved metal concentrations were measured to check for precipitation or adsorption in selected treatments by ICP-MS (7) or ICP-OES (8).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Heavy Metal Tolerance of Fe(III)-Reducing Microbial Communities in Contaminated Creek Bank Soils

Burkhardt

Bischoff

Akob

et al. 2011

106

Toxic metals can be immobilized on surface sorption sites of soil Fe(III) minerals or can be included in the mineral structure (4, 29). Fe(III)-reducing bacteria (FeRB) can facilitate the release of these metals by reductive dissolution of Fe(III) oxides (9, 17) and bioreduction of Fe(III) oxide-bound trace metals (42). This release might enhance metal stress, suggesting that metal tolerance should be an important attribute for FeRB. Acidophilic FeRB can tolerate millimolar concentrations of Cd, Cu, Ni, and Zn (12), which might be a prerequisite to survival in habitats where low pH facilitates high metal solubility. In contrast, neutrophilic FeRB like Shewanella spp. tolerate only M concentrations (34, 36). Geobacter spp. have not been tested to the best of our knowledge, but metal tolerance proteins are expressed during growth in uranium-contaminated sediments, which might be connected to metal resistance (19).Near Ronneburg (Thuringia, Germany), uranium mining caused severe environmental contamination with metals and radionuclides (20). In creek bank alluvial soils of the Gessenbach, a main drainage system of upstream mining sites (41), high heavy metal concentrations occur both in solid phase and in the pore water of a ground-and surface water-influenced, oxidized, iron-rich Btlc horizon of a Luvic Gleysol. We demonstrated the solubilization of Co, Ni, Zn, As, and U in Btlc soil microcosms during biostimulated microbial Fe(III) reduction that was associated with the activity of microorganisms related to Delta-and Betaproteobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Firmicutes (7). The aims of this study were to (i) determine the heavy metal fraction of the solid phase, which could be released during reductive dissolution of Fe(III) oxides, (ii) estimate the effect of heavy metals on the activity of FeRB in the Gessenbach creek bank soil, and (iii) identify metal-tolerant FeRB, because the permanent exposure to contaminants during the last 50 years should have promoted metal tolerance.Soil geochemistry. Putative binding forms of heavy metals in the Btlc soil solid phase were determined by sequential extraction (8, 43) in samples collected in August 2006. Metal concentrations were analyzed with either ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry) or ICP-OES (optical emission spectrometry) (8). Most metals (20 to 40%) and even 80% of As in Btlc soil were detected in fraction 5, which is representative for amorphous Fe(III) oxides (Fig. 1). A considerable amount of uranium (30%) was recovered in the specifically adsorbed fraction, whereas only Zn and Ni were primarily recovered in the mobile fraction. Zn and Ni also dominated the heavy metal pore water concentration of the creek bank soil, which was sampled monthly from June to November 2007 (7). Pore water heavy metal and As concentrations always peaked in the Btlc horizon (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) and reached maximum concentrations of 38.6, 16.4, 3.9, 1.5, 0.6, and 0.3 M for Zn, Ni, Al, Cu, Co, and Cd, respectively. Pore water Fe(II) concentrations, ...