2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9ra02454a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial single-cell growth response at defined carbon limiting conditions

Abstract: Using microfluidic single-cell cultivation technologies and modelling we examined how single-cell growth at defined carbon conditions, ranging from strongly limiting conditions to a carbon surplus, influenced cell-to-cell variability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, the reduction of PCA concentration mainly affected growth rate and batch time, but as a general principle, lowering the concentration below critical thresholds typically resulted in significantly reduced reproducibility between biological replicates. This observation is supported by current reports from Lindemann et al whose microfluidic cultivation experiments with C. glutamicum growing on PCA as sole carbon source revealed, besides other effects, significant influence of PCA concentration on doubling time and cell-to-cell variability [25]. Anyway, for the given process, batch time proved to be the most sensitive parameter with respect to PCA variation.…”
Section: Protocatechuic Acid Interferes With Ph Measurementsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In summary, the reduction of PCA concentration mainly affected growth rate and batch time, but as a general principle, lowering the concentration below critical thresholds typically resulted in significantly reduced reproducibility between biological replicates. This observation is supported by current reports from Lindemann et al whose microfluidic cultivation experiments with C. glutamicum growing on PCA as sole carbon source revealed, besides other effects, significant influence of PCA concentration on doubling time and cell-to-cell variability [25]. Anyway, for the given process, batch time proved to be the most sensitive parameter with respect to PCA variation.…”
Section: Protocatechuic Acid Interferes With Ph Measurementsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The current state of knowledge related to the C. glutamicum response to pH stress is based on bulk population studies with microbial cells cultivated in small bioreactors or shaking flasks (Jakob et al, 2007;Follmann et al, 2009b). Using these methods, representative information cannot be gathered for individual cells (Lindström and Andersson-Svahn, 2010), and cell-tocell heterogeneity remains unclear (Lindemann et al, 2019). Furthermore, traditional cultivation lacks temporal precision and spatial resolution, e.g., due to slow mixing in large volumes to perform stress response experiments, such as those with defined stress pulses, or even the investigation of oscillating stress conditions (Lara et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to studies in bioreactors, it is possible to follow phenotypic development and regulation of isolated cells with spatiotemporal resolution and to distinguish contributions from intrinsic stochastic processes and environmental factors (Weibel et al, 2007;Dusny and Schmid, 2015). On this basis, the systems can reveal fundamental insight into cellular regulation strategies to nutrient-limited conditions (Lindemann et al, 2019). Several microfluidic cultivation concepts exist where cells are trapped by different physical principles.…”
Section: Discussion Of Single-cell Technologies For the Study Of Adapmentioning
confidence: 99%