2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13205-020-02318-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial spectrum, antibiotic susceptibility profile, and biofilm formation of diabetic foot infections (2014–18): a retrospective multicenter analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, biofilms exhibit enhanced tolerance to antibiotics compared to free-living bacteria, which makes treatment of wound infections challenging [32]. A retrospective study has demonstrated that Gram-negative from DFI were found to be biofilm producers [38]. The results of the present study demonstrated that all P. aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae strains produced biofilms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Indeed, biofilms exhibit enhanced tolerance to antibiotics compared to free-living bacteria, which makes treatment of wound infections challenging [32]. A retrospective study has demonstrated that Gram-negative from DFI were found to be biofilm producers [38]. The results of the present study demonstrated that all P. aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae strains produced biofilms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…More recent studies demonstrated higher rates of ESBL, such as the study by Jouhar et al which found an ESBL prevalence of 25% among 314 enterobacteriaceae isolates (Jouhar et al, 2020). Some studies focusing specifically on E. coli found even higher rates of ESBL, ranging from 43.7% to 77.8% (Al-Joufi et al, 2020;Li et al, 2018;Najari et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The proportion of patients infected with MRSA in our study was 9.2%, which is similar to the proportion reported in a small study conducted in our country in the early 2000s (Lysyy et al, 2008). Global prevalence of MRSA infection in DFU patients reported ranges from 7.7%-43.2% in different regions, though rates probably depend on the sample size and patient characteristics, as well as geographical variations in prevalence (Al-Joufi et al, 2020;Son et al, 2017;Zubair et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DFIs are usually polymicrobial infections involving aerobic gram-positive cocci, gram-negative bacteria, and anaerobes 58 . A recent multicenter study by Fakhria et al revealed that polymicrobial infection was identified in 48.5% of patients and that the isolated gram-positive pathogen was 46.7%, gram-negative was 38.6%, and anaerobes were 7.9% in 792 diabetic foot patients 60 . The study also showed that the predominant pathogens were S. aureus (22.2%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (7.7%), Enterococcus spp.…”
Section: Biofilms and Dfusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(12.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.4%), E. coli (7.9%), Klebsiella spp. (7.5%), Proteus mirabilis (8.9%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (6.6%), anaerobic organisms (5.9%), and fungi (2.3%) 60 .…”
Section: Biofilms and Dfusmentioning
confidence: 99%