2004
DOI: 10.1108/00070700410553585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbiological and observational analysis of cross contamination risks during domestic food preparation

Abstract: The use of an observational approach in conjunction with isolation techniques for campylobacter and salmonella detection has facilitated a detailed evaluation of the risk of cross contamination during food preparation. Identification of suspected exposure routes has linked naturally contaminated raw foods with important food‐handling malpractices, contaminated contact surfaces and ready‐to‐eat foods. In a model domestic kitchen, 29 per cent of food preparation sessions resulted in positive campylobacter isolat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
78
2
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(36 reference statements)
4
78
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…. Redmond and Griffith 2004;Perez-Rodriguez and others 2008;Ferreira and others 2014). Some bacteria can be regarded as transient organisms that occur by coincidence, whereas others may establish themselves, grow, and form residential populations in food production environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Redmond and Griffith 2004;Perez-Rodriguez and others 2008;Ferreira and others 2014). Some bacteria can be regarded as transient organisms that occur by coincidence, whereas others may establish themselves, grow, and form residential populations in food production environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, food-safety objectives are now being set at the moment of consumption rather than at the moment of purchase (WHO/FAO, 2004) with consumers being heralded as the essential final link in the food chain to ensure safe food consumption and avoid food-borne disease (The Pennington Group, 1997, as cited in Redmond et al, 2004). This shift in focus has allowed researchers to comprehensively examine domestic food preparation practices using telephone surveys (Cody & Hogue, 2003;Redmond & Griffith, 2004a;Woodburn & Raab, 1997), postal surveys (Angell, 2008;Dharod et al, 2004;Redmond & Griffith, 2005a;Redmond & Griffith, 2005b;Redmond & Griffith, 2006a;Takeuchi et al, 2005a;Takeuchi et al, 2005b;Williamson et al, 1992), online surveys (Byrd-Bredbenner et al, 2007;Nauta et al, 2008;Unusan, 2007), home visits (Worsfold & Griffith, 1996), observations (Anderson et al, 2004;Clayton et al, 2003;Fischer, A. et al, 2007;Jay et al, 1999;Redmond & Griffith, 2006b;Redmond et al, 2004), laboratory simulations (Meredith et al, 2001) and reviews (Redmond & Griffith, 2003;Sattar et al, 1999;Wilcock et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was argued by Howes et al (1996) that 97% of foodborne diseases are caused by food handlers' improper practices in foodservice establishments. Such malpractices were deemed as risk factors causing cross-contamination of food (Redmond et al, 2004;Todd et al, 2007). Moreover, food handlers are expected carriers of biological food hazards (Medus et al, 2006;Todd et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%