2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-020-04022-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbiological diagnosis of suspected vertebral osteomyelitis with a focus on the yield of percutaneous needle biopsy: a 10-year cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The microbiologically confirmed VO rate remained stable as compared to the previous studies using PMSI [ 2 , 4 ], even with the SPILF guidelines recommending a more active seeking for microbiological diagnosis. Other European studies found the same stability of microbiologically confirmed VOs over recent years [ 10 , 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The microbiologically confirmed VO rate remained stable as compared to the previous studies using PMSI [ 2 , 4 ], even with the SPILF guidelines recommending a more active seeking for microbiological diagnosis. Other European studies found the same stability of microbiologically confirmed VOs over recent years [ 10 , 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Vertebral biopsies, CT-guided or surgical, can document almost all anaerobic cases of vertebral osteomyelitis. Interestingly, previous antibiotic intake was shown as the only predictor for vertebral biopsy negativity [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a 10-year cohort study, Avenel et al recently found that, when VO was suspected on imaging, bacteriological investigation identified the microorganism in 209/300 (70%) of the cases [ 18 ]. The yield of percutaneous needle biopsy was 54.8% and the only predictor of percutaneous needle biopsy negativity, detected in a multivariate analysis was previous antibiotic intake [ 18 ]. There was no statistically significant difference in the frequencies of causative pathogens between the HAVO and CAVO cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%