2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12245-021-00360-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbiological findings in emergency department patients with sepsis identified by the Sepsis-3 criteria: a single-center prospective population-based cohort study

Abstract: Background Studies comparing the microbiological profiles among sepsis patients identified with either Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria are limited. The aim was to examine if there are differences in the microbiological findings among septic patients identified by Sepsis-3 criteria compared to patients identified by the previous sepsis criteria, SIRS, and without organ failure. A secondary purpose was to examine if we co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the mortality rates from our study cohort were slightly low (5%–7%). However, the in‐hospital mortality rates reported in our study were close to those in other ED studies using slightly different definitions to identify sepsis patients, for example, 8% by Sørensen et al 34 and Tarabichi et al 35 (using Sepsis‐3), 8.5% by Gaieski et al 36 (using ICD‐10 coding), and 5.7% by Berger et al 37 (using two or more SIRS criteria and clinical suspicion of infection). We included the two most common culture types ordered from EDs as nearly 75% of all cultures ordered at study sites during the study period were BC and urine culture.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, the mortality rates from our study cohort were slightly low (5%–7%). However, the in‐hospital mortality rates reported in our study were close to those in other ED studies using slightly different definitions to identify sepsis patients, for example, 8% by Sørensen et al 34 and Tarabichi et al 35 (using Sepsis‐3), 8.5% by Gaieski et al 36 (using ICD‐10 coding), and 5.7% by Berger et al 37 (using two or more SIRS criteria and clinical suspicion of infection). We included the two most common culture types ordered from EDs as nearly 75% of all cultures ordered at study sites during the study period were BC and urine culture.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Hence, the mortality rates from our study cohort were slightly low (5%-7%). However, the in-hospital mortality rates reported in our study were close to those in other ED studies using slightly different definitions to identify sepsis patients, for example, 8% by Sørensen et al 34 and Tarabichi et al 35 (using Sepsis-3), 8.5% by Gaieski et al 36 (using ICD-10 coding), and 5.7% by Berger et al 37…”
Section: Nonbacteremic Sepsis Cases With Positive Urine Cultures (Bc−...supporting
confidence: 88%