1966
DOI: 10.1128/aem.14.1.1-7.1966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbiology of Drycleaning

Abstract: Microbiology of drycleaning. Appl. Microbiol. 14:1-7. 1966.-An appreciable number of bacteria on contaminated fabric survived modem drycleaning procedures. Various stages in the process, especially steam pressing, reduced the total number of bacteria, but viable organisms were found on certain areas of garments even after pressing. A significant number of bacteria were redeposited on clean fabric during the washing of ordinary soiled garments in drycleaning units. These bacteria included gram-positive cocci, d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies done by E. A. Hooker et al and R. R. Banville showed Gram-positive cocci were the most prevalent organisms. These findings are coherent with the present study [9,10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Studies done by E. A. Hooker et al and R. R. Banville showed Gram-positive cocci were the most prevalent organisms. These findings are coherent with the present study [9,10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The bacteria identified include Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter aerogenes, Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella aerogenes. This coincides with other reports [13,14,15]. A number of studies specifically focused on searching Hospital Acquired Infections-relevant pathogens, mostly Staphylococcus aureus or Enterococci [16,17] but research reports on microbial load of household bed linens are scanty hence, relatedness of microbial species isolated from household to those from the hospital has not been reported.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Overall, none of the washing processes helped decrease bacterial growth at the tube junctions. Moreover, no remarkable differences may have been observed among the washing groups, owing to the redeposition of bacteria [13]. However, a difference was observed in the appearance of the feeding tube junctions.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%