2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.02.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbleeds may expand acutely after traumatic brain injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we report diffuse cortical microhemorrhages on SWI 1 week post‐rmCHI, confirmed histopathologically with positive Prussian blue reaction products in the cortical neuropil of injured animals. Clinically, the number, localization, type, and magnitude of microhemorrhage are associated with severity of injury and prognostication of functional outcome at 6–12 months (L. Liu et al, ; S. Liu et al, ; Toth et al, ). The number and extent of microbleeds is dynamic, however (Toth et al, ), emphasizing the importance of longitudinal and noninvasive SWI assessment of hemorrhage concomitant with clinical signs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we report diffuse cortical microhemorrhages on SWI 1 week post‐rmCHI, confirmed histopathologically with positive Prussian blue reaction products in the cortical neuropil of injured animals. Clinically, the number, localization, type, and magnitude of microhemorrhage are associated with severity of injury and prognostication of functional outcome at 6–12 months (L. Liu et al, ; S. Liu et al, ; Toth et al, ). The number and extent of microbleeds is dynamic, however (Toth et al, ), emphasizing the importance of longitudinal and noninvasive SWI assessment of hemorrhage concomitant with clinical signs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinically, the number, localization, type, and magnitude of microhemorrhage are associated with severity of injury and prognostication of functional outcome at 6–12 months (L. Liu et al, ; S. Liu et al, ; Toth et al, ). The number and extent of microbleeds is dynamic, however (Toth et al, ), emphasizing the importance of longitudinal and noninvasive SWI assessment of hemorrhage concomitant with clinical signs. Prussian blue detects hemosiderin deposits at a cellular level in sections 4–6‐μm thin, allowing for much greater resolution of reactive blood products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] While CT remains the gold standard for the initial evaluation in fast detecting hemorrhages,[22] SWI enhances contrast in hemorrhagic foci and helps depict localization, volume and number of injuries. [22, 23] Size of lesions might appear larger on SWI than on T1 or T2 weighted images because of the susceptibility effect of hemoglobin degradation. SWI has been shown to be more sensitive for evaluation of microhemorrhages in the brainstem and corpus callosum than CT, T2, T2* and FLAIR imaging.…”
Section: Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6, 2426] SWI may be considered as a valuable tool for patient follow-up because imaging methods, like CT and conventional MRI, are less sensitive for evaluating evolving and small hemorrhagic lesions. [23, 27] The number and volume of hemorrhagic lesions have been noted to correlate with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, with brainstem lesions correlating especially well with GCS. [25, 26, 28]…”
Section: Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it was believed that trauma‐related microbleeds (also known as hemorrhagic diffuse axonal injuries or shearing injuries) remain more or less constant over years. However, recent evidence suggests that such lesions may decrease overtime (Liu et al ., ), grow (Toth et al ., ) or (temporarily) disappear (Watanabe et al ., ). Moreover, we can assume that some regions might show white matter Wallerian‐type degeneration after brain trauma, while other areas might develop compensatory increasing connectivity.…”
Section: Progressive or Regressive Brain Abnormalities?mentioning
confidence: 99%