2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2018.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microcalcifications in breast cancer: From pathophysiology to diagnosis and prognosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
81
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
1
81
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…According to logistic regression analysis, the OR value of coarse calcification and micro-calcification was 0.98 (P=0.9766) and 4.67 (P=0.0006), respectively. Microcalcification was significantly associated with malignant lesions, which is the same as previous studies [28]. In addition, the margins in this study were highly significant for the diagnosis of 4a lesions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…According to logistic regression analysis, the OR value of coarse calcification and micro-calcification was 0.98 (P=0.9766) and 4.67 (P=0.0006), respectively. Microcalcification was significantly associated with malignant lesions, which is the same as previous studies [28]. In addition, the margins in this study were highly significant for the diagnosis of 4a lesions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The incidence and mortality of breast cancer (BC) have been high among female malignant tumors, which seriously threatens the health of women worldwide (1,2). Despite advances in early screening and therapeutic strategy for BC in recent years, the 5-year survival rate of patients with BC is still not ideal due to high metastases and recurrences (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, ectopic instigation of epithelium-to-osteomimicry transition in breast cancer cells enhanced bone metastasis in mouse models of breast cancer 57 . Interestingly, primary breast tumors that display micro-calcifications detected by mammographic screening are associated with decreased survival and increased risk of bone metastasis 58 , suggesting that osteomimicry may be a feature of tumor cell subpopulations in the primary tumor that provides them with bone-metastatic advantages. Taken together, our results suggest that acquisition of EMT and osteomimicry programs, combined with instigation of immunosuppression may endow breast cancer cells with bone metastatic capacity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%