“…With regard to the imprecision, the data obtained in our study proven that all methods were performing better than 4.5% CV, as also recently reported (Anagnostopoulos et al, 2009), thus confirming that the quality of the automated HPLC and CE methods is higher with respect to the imprecision obtainable years ago with the minicolumns methods (Brosius et al, 1978), or by cellulose acetate electrophoresis followed by densitometry, or after elution of the HbA and HbA 2 bands and spectrophotometric quantitation (International Committee for Standardization in Haemathology 1978). However, from a recent study we have performed under rigorous conditions in agreement with the approach recommended (Fraser & Harris, 1989), HbA 2 seems to have a very narrow intra-individual biological variability, of the order of 0.4% (as CV), as for a typical genetic marker (Paleari et al, 2011).…”