“…Although this approach does not allow us to assess marginal effects of, for example, early seral forest loss in conjunction with mature forest lost, the relatively small sample of counts within each landscape (i.e., maximum of 29 years) precluded a more highly parameterized model (Harrell, Lee, & Mark, ; Peduzzi, Concato, Kemper, Holford, & Feinstein, ). Furthermore, despite the high quality and fine resolution of our spatial data, recent work suggests that microclimatic factors (i.e., those at finer scales than can be assessed with satellite imagery) influence bird responses to climate (Betts, Phalan et al, ; Frey, Hadley, & Betts, ). Thus, other factors that were beyond the scope of our study are likely to have influenced bird population dynamics, but we restricted our focus to the factors we expected to be most influential over our study period.…”