“…Previously, plasma separation inside microfluidic devices was demonstrated using a variety of distinct approaches, including silicon-glass particle separation system based on Zweifach-Fung effect, 25 cross-flow filtration microdevice, 26 microchannel flow-based separation, 27 two-phase plug, 24,28 highly confined microchannels, 29 micro-gap filter, 30 capillary-driven microfluidic device with a planar crossflow filter using surfactant-added Poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS), 31 stand-alone self-powered integrated microfluidic system, 32 Pyrex glass attached to a silicon wafer with microfluidics, 33 capillary force through a bead-packed microchannel, 34,35 elevated-dimension clog-free T-microchannels utilizing the Zweifach-Fung and Fahraeus effects, 36,37 a combination of the Fahraeus effect, bifurcation law, cell-free region, centrifugal action, and constriction-expansion utilized together. 38,39 Common microfabrication methods for miniaturized diagnostic tests in microfluidics devices include photolithography, soft lithography, hot embossing, laser ablation, injection moulding and plasma etching. Nevertheless, to use most of the proposed methods, it is necessary to apply moulds and/or masks to fabricate these devices, which are not ideal for rapid prototyping; they also often use some external equipment to generate fluidic flux like a peristaltic pump or vacuum.…”