2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12194-021-00627-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microdosimetry-based relative biological effectiveness calculations for radiotherapeutic electron beams: a FLUKA-based study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that reirradiations due to recurrent disease represent a significant proportion of intraoperative electron beam treatments, differences in biological damage, such as those found in this work, may not be irrelevant, especially in healthy organs where the dose received in previous treatments is close to the maximum tolerable dose limit. As already mentioned in the Introduction section of this paper, for the 6 MeV beam, Chattaraj et al [63] found that using the TDRA theory, RBE varied from 0.74 to 0.84, both values relative to 60 Co, over the range of water depths in our work (1.5-3 cm). The variation of RBE per mm is 0.0066 for HGS cells, similar to that measured in our study for the HaCat cell survival fraction (0.007 ∆SF/mm).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that reirradiations due to recurrent disease represent a significant proportion of intraoperative electron beam treatments, differences in biological damage, such as those found in this work, may not be irrelevant, especially in healthy organs where the dose received in previous treatments is close to the maximum tolerable dose limit. As already mentioned in the Introduction section of this paper, for the 6 MeV beam, Chattaraj et al [63] found that using the TDRA theory, RBE varied from 0.74 to 0.84, both values relative to 60 Co, over the range of water depths in our work (1.5-3 cm). The variation of RBE per mm is 0.0066 for HGS cells, similar to that measured in our study for the HaCat cell survival fraction (0.007 ∆SF/mm).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…TDRA has been widely used to estimate the RBE of different types of particles [ 58 , 59 , 60 ], including electrons [ 61 , 62 ]. Chattaraj et al [ 63 ] calculated the RBE values based on TDRA and MKM with a FLUKA-MCTS code [ 64 ] for different therapeutic electron beams (6, 12 and 18 MeV). For the 6 MeV beam, the change in the RBE_TDRA value between the depths of 0.2 × R50 (R50 is the depth at which 50% of the maximum dose is reached) and 1.2 × R50 was around 18%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herskind et al 20 measured the RBE of 10 MeV electrons to be 0.98 and 0.91 for MCF7 (breast cancer) and HUVEC (endothelium) cells respectively, suggesting that electrons across a range of energies have an RBE of > 1 when measuring cell survival. An RBE value of 0.84 for cell survival has also predicted for electron energies in the 6–18 MeV range using Monte Carlo modelling 21 . It should be noted that clinically, an RBE of 1 is used for electrons and has been for several decades.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…5 × 10 7 electrons were tracked in the simulations. Similar approach was adopted by Chattaraj et al [45] for calculating microdosimetric distribution of radiotherapeutic electrons as a function of depth in water phantom.…”
Section: Calculations Of Microdosimetric Distributions In Topasmentioning
confidence: 99%