MicroED Structure of Au₁₄₆(p-MBA)₅₇ at Subatomic Resolution Reveals a Twinned FCC Cluster

Abstract

Solving the atomic structure of metallic clusters is fundamental to understanding their optical, electronic, and chemical properties. Herein we present the structure of the largest aqueous gold cluster, Au146(p-MBA)57 (p-MBA: para-mercaptobenzoic acid), solved by electron diffraction (MicroED) to subatomic resolution (0.85 Å) and by X-ray diffraction at atomic resolution (1.3 Å). The 146 gold atoms may be decomposed into two constituent sets consisting of 119 core and 27 peripheral atoms. The core atoms are organized in a twinned FCC structure whereas the surface gold atoms follow a C2 rotational symmetry about an axis bisecting the twinning plane. The protective layer of 57 p-MBAs fully encloses the cluster and comprises bridging, monomeric, and dimeric staple motifs. Au146(p-MBA)57 is the largest cluster observed exhibiting a bulk-like FCC structure as well as the smallest gold particle exhibiting a stacking fault.

Observation of Non‐FCC Copper in Alkynyl‐Protected Cu53Nanoclusters

“…The decisive role of ligands on the kernel structure has also been exemplified by various Ag NCs . These and other inspiring discoveries in the field are excellent models for analyzing the interaction of ligands with metals and also are the key links for understanding the evolution from single atom to the bulk metal …”

The CryoEM Method MicroED as a Powerful Tool for Small Molecule Structure Determination

“…Electrons interact with matter more strongly than X-rays and they are affected by the charge (16). While it is extremely challenging to observe protons in X-ray structures, it is relatively common in MicroED data (17)(18)(19)(20). Several protons were observed in all structures.…”

Illuminating the Secrets of Crystals - Microcrystal Electron Diffraction in Structural Biology

“…A faster rotation with a shorter frame rate might reduce electron dosage while preventing spot overlap. Rotation speeds varied over experiments, from 0.1°/s (Vergara et al, 2017) to 0.29 o /s (de la Cruz et al, 2017), but Table 1 shows that resolution vs rotation speed (Fig. 6) and frame scope (the angle covered by a single frame, Fig.…”