1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02536897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfacies controls on weathering of carbonate building stones: Devonian (northern Sauerland, Germany)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…X-ray diffraction analyses reveal that both types of rocks are composed of ~99% calcite. Consistent with qualitative observations of limestones that suggest that coarsegrained rock can be more resistant to weathering (May, 1994), our results confirm that textural features may play a role in determining erosional rates. Texture-dependent erosion is often attributed to efflorescence (Espinosa Marzal and Scherer, 2008); however, the Western Wall site is well drained and there is no apparent evidence of salt damage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…X-ray diffraction analyses reveal that both types of rocks are composed of ~99% calcite. Consistent with qualitative observations of limestones that suggest that coarsegrained rock can be more resistant to weathering (May, 1994), our results confirm that textural features may play a role in determining erosional rates. Texture-dependent erosion is often attributed to efflorescence (Espinosa Marzal and Scherer, 2008); however, the Western Wall site is well drained and there is no apparent evidence of salt damage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…4b) and the local gradual transition from coarse rudstone (MF9) to grainstone (MF8) support this assumption. The described sequence is comparable to other sections (May 1994), which have been interpreted to represent parts of allodapic limestone turbidites (Meischner 1964). This microfacies corresponds to the basal part of a proximal limestone turbidite deposited on the proximal part of a fore-reef environment below the FWWB.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The microfacies were compared with other existing microfacies models such as those of Mamet and Pre ´at (1985), Tucker (1974), Wendt and Aigner (1985), May (1994), andCasier andPreat (2007).…”
Section: Microfaciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the presence of wackestone-packstone intraclasts (MF2), which are interpreted as background sedimentation (see interpretation of MF2), the depositional setting of MF5 might be located under the FWWB. Similar microfacies have been described by May (1994) and Pas et al (2013) for the fore-reef-slope environment from the Rhenisches Schiefergebirge (Germany) and are interpreted as a part of the general pattern visible in ''allodapic'' limestone (Zone 1b; Meischner 1964) and in the ideal turbiditic sequence of Bouma (division Tb;Bouma 1962). Other sedimentological criteria such as the presence of lamination, local fining upward sequences also support a deposition related to turbidity currents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%