2017
DOI: 10.3791/55957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfluidic Bioprinting for Engineering Vascularized Tissues and Organoids

Abstract: Engineering vascularized tissue constructs and organoids has been historically challenging. Here we describe a novel method based on microfluidic bioprinting to generate a scaffold with multilayer interlacing hydrogel microfibers. To achieve smooth bioprinting, a core-sheath microfluidic printhead containing a composite bioink formulation extruded from the core flow and the crosslinking solution carried by the sheath flow, was designed and fitted onto the bioprinter. By blending gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
37
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, as the crosslinked alginate was gradually dissociated and leached out of the bioprinted construct, the diameter of the remaining GelMA/alginate composite hydrogel microfibers increased due to swelling (Figure e). The diameters of the microfibers increased from 313 ± 25 µm at day 0 (immediately following bioprinting/photo‐crosslinking) to 437 ± 38 µm at day 1 and 509 ± 70 µm at day 3, consistent with the literature . Accompanying the swelling, the removal of the alginate could also induce the enlargement of the pores of the remaining hydrogel microfibers, potentially leading to improved behaviors of the encapsulated cells, as we previously reported …”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Meanwhile, as the crosslinked alginate was gradually dissociated and leached out of the bioprinted construct, the diameter of the remaining GelMA/alginate composite hydrogel microfibers increased due to swelling (Figure e). The diameters of the microfibers increased from 313 ± 25 µm at day 0 (immediately following bioprinting/photo‐crosslinking) to 437 ± 38 µm at day 1 and 509 ± 70 µm at day 3, consistent with the literature . Accompanying the swelling, the removal of the alginate could also induce the enlargement of the pores of the remaining hydrogel microfibers, potentially leading to improved behaviors of the encapsulated cells, as we previously reported …”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Of note, this microfluidic bioprinting procedure has been demonstrated benign to the encapsulated cells . As revealed in Figure f‐i, the viability of the HepG2/C3A cells was maintained at a level of >85% post‐bioprinting analyzed from semiquantitative calculations based on live/dead staining, suggesting the biocompatibility of the CaCl 2 crosslinker at the selected concentration, as well as the minimal damage exerted by the shear stress during the extrusion of the cell‐laden bioink.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations