“…These values are much greater than those of some recently reported FSC devices, such as the CF@RGO@MnO 2 fiber device (18.5 μWh/cm 2 , 0.4 mW/cm 2 ), 39 the MnO 2 -modified nanoporous gold wire device (5.4 μWh/cm 2 , 0.284 μW/cm 2 ), 40 ultrathin VN nanosheet/ carbon fiber (1.428 μWh/cm 2 , 0.051 mW/cm 2 ), 20 VO 2 / graphene yarn (8.2 μWh/cm 2 , 0.9 mW/cm 2 ), 41 symmetric PHCFs@PANI fibers device (55.3 μWh/cm 2 , 0.44 mW/ cm 2 ), 42 activated carbon@SWCNT yarn-based micro-SC (3.29 μWh/cm 2 , 0.04 mW/cm 2 ), 43 conductive polymer/ RuO 2 /PEDOT:PSS fibers device (22.5 μWh/cm 2 , 0.75 mW/ cm 2 ), 44 PANI/S-TiO 2 /Ti wires device (3.2 μWh/cm 2 , 0.5 mW/cm 2 ), 45 3DCS/polyaniline fiber device (30.92 μWh/cm 2 , 1.78 mW/cm 2 ), 46 and PANI/MCNTs-rGO/TPU hybrid fiber device (3.45 μWh/cm 2 , 0.017 mW/cm 2 ). 47 The FASC device's volumetric energy density of 27.5 mWh/cm 3 and volumetric power density of 2.91 W/cm 3 are also much higher than the values of some reported FSCs (Figure S9), such as MnO 2 coated carbon fiber-based micro-SC (0.12 mWh/cm 3 , 0.4 W/ cm 3 ), 6 MWCNT-rGO@cellulose composite yarn-based SC (3.7 mWh/cm 3 , 0.04 W/cm 3 ), 48 and Co 3 O 4 /metal fibers@ graphene/carbon fibers (0.62 mWh/cm 3 , 1.47 W/cm 3 ). 49 The superior electrochemical performance of the FASC device can be attributed to three factors.…”