2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1691-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microhabitat associations and seedling bank dynamics in a neotropical forest

Abstract: We conducted a rigorous test of tropical tree seedling microhabitat differentiation by examining microhabitat associations, survival and growth of established seedlings of ten tropical tree species representing a four-factor gradient in seed size. Eight microhabitat variables describing soil and light conditions were measured directly adjacent to each of 588 seedlings within twelve 10x100 m belt transects at Paracou, French Guiana, and at 264 reference points along the transects. From these measurements, we de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A final possible explanation for the lack of observed microhabitat partitioning is simply that the null hypothesis is true; that is, performance rankings between species differing in seed mass do not change along environmental gradients. We argue that this may indeed be the case, at least across understorey conditions such as those we measured, noting that our results are consistent with those of habitat association field surveys for tropical tree juveniles, in which few or weak relationships between species and environment have been found (Webb & Peart 2000; Baraloto & Goldberg 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A final possible explanation for the lack of observed microhabitat partitioning is simply that the null hypothesis is true; that is, performance rankings between species differing in seed mass do not change along environmental gradients. We argue that this may indeed be the case, at least across understorey conditions such as those we measured, noting that our results are consistent with those of habitat association field surveys for tropical tree juveniles, in which few or weak relationships between species and environment have been found (Webb & Peart 2000; Baraloto & Goldberg 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Although canopy gaps (where light availability is > 6% of full‐sun PAR) represent less than 5% of the ground surface area in many tropical forests (Brokaw 1985; van der Meer & Bongers 1996; C. Baraloto & P. Couteron, unpublished data), it is conceivable that species could partition light gradients that range above that measured in the plots in this study (Rose & Poorter 2003). Nevertheless, the eight species we studied all co‐occur in deeply shaded habitats with light levels < 3% of full‐sun PAR (Baraloto & Goldberg 2004). Furthermore, in a complementary field experiment in which seedlings of nine species, including six of those studied here, were planted in gap and understorey conditions across four soil types, only three of the 36 possible species pairs were found to switch rankings for survival or RGR between any microhabitat type (Baraloto et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light availability is also essential for carbon assimilation and plant growth (Nicotra et al 1999;Dalling and Hubbell 2002;Montgomery and Chazdon 2002). Ground-level light maps derived from LiDAR could be thus of great interest in providing better predictive underpinnings for the demographic studies of understory plants (Ackerly and Bazzaz 1995;Baraloto andGoldberg 2004 Laurans M et al 2012;Vincent G et al 2011). Species composition and vegetation abundance in the understory also vary with differences in micro-environmental conditions (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light is critical to seed germination (Baskin and Baskin 2001;Willis et al 2014) and seedling and sapling growth within tropical forests (Tinoco-Ojanguren and Pearcy 1995; Baraloto and Goldberg 2004;Palomaki et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in previous studies, differences in performance did not necessarily coincide with a homesite advantage of habitat specialists in their preferred habitat (Baraloto andGoldberg 2004, Russo et al 2005). In addition, strong habitat associations have been observed in the absence of large, habitat-specific differences in performance (Yamada et al 2007).…”
Section: Seedling Dynamics and Species-habitat Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%