2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-005-0158-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microincisional cataract surgery and Thinoptx rollable intraocular lens implantation

Abstract: Based on the limited data in the literature and in this study, it is not possible to make concrete decisions about the benefits and disadvantages of the ThinOptx IOL for longer durations. Intraoperatively, this IOL apparently eliminates the need for enlargement of the corneal incision during implantation. However, the statistical insignificance of induced astigmatisms after microincisions and classical phacoincisions should also be taken into consideration. We conclude that ThinOptx IOL is a pioneering intraoc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With the microaxial procedure, the size of the corneal incision is reduced from 3.2 mm to 2.2 mm, while in biaxial phacoemulsification (B-MICS) the cornea incision is between 0.9 and 1.5 mm. 6 , 7 , 8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the microaxial procedure, the size of the corneal incision is reduced from 3.2 mm to 2.2 mm, while in biaxial phacoemulsification (B-MICS) the cornea incision is between 0.9 and 1.5 mm. 6 , 7 , 8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first insertion of this in 2001, 2 6 reports of the astigmatic effect of this procedure have been published. [3][4][5][6][7][8] However, few of the reports used vector analysis, the preferred standard of reporting astigmatic change. 9,10 An article by Cinhuseyinoglu et al 7 states that vector analysis was performed; however, the results presented are those of a keratometry subtraction method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8] However, few of the reports used vector analysis, the preferred standard of reporting astigmatic change. 9,10 An article by Cinhuseyinoglu et al 7 states that vector analysis was performed; however, the results presented are those of a keratometry subtraction method. Dogru et al 6 assessed the magnitude of astigmatic change with the Holladay-Cravy-Koch formula and found an induced astigmatic change of 0.06 diopter (D) G 0.50 (SD) 6 months after surgery using a temporal 1.6 mm (enlarged to 2.2 mm) and a superonasal 1.6 mm clear corneal incision.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Einführung der MICS war erst durch die Entwicklung geeigneter Intraokularfaltlinsen möglich. Heute stehen bereits mehr als 15 Faltlinsen für die MICS zur Verfügung [1][2][3][4]. Sowohl das Material als auch das Design der Optik und Haptiken sind für die Stabilität der sehr dünnen Linsen im Kapselsack und die Nachstarentwicklung verantwortlich [1].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified