Microleakage at the gingival wall with four Class V anterior restorative materials

Welsh, Edward L.; Hembree, John H.

doi:10.1016/0022-3913(85)90554-2

Cited by 45 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The glass-ionomer cement restorations have been shown to give a better seal than any of the composite resin combinations in unbevelled cavities in both the present work and in the shorter term studies (Saunders et al, 1990). This result is in agreement with the findings of Maldonado et al (1978), Glyn and Welsh & Hembree (1985). It seems likely that the good seal found with the glass-ionomer is the result of an effective chemical bond between it and both the enamel and dentine of the walls and margins of the cavity.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

The effects of dentine bonding agents on marginal leakage of composite restorations – long‐term studies

Grieve

Saunders

Alani

1993

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to compare the effects upon marginal leakage of a number of dentine bonding agents when used with a posterior composite resin, Occlusin, after storage for periods of up to 2 years. The bonding agents used were Gluma, Scotchbond, Topaz and an experimental material. The results were compared with a glass ionomer, Chemfil II. Class V cavities with or without a bevelled cavo-surface margin were prepared in the buccal surfaces of extracted premolar teeth. Following restoration, the teeth were stored for periods of up to 2 years and then thermally cycled. Marginal leakage was subsequently demonstrated using a radioactive isotope containing 45Ca, and an auto-radiographic technique. Image analysis was used to determine the total amount of linear leakage for each specimen. The results showed that some leakage occurred for all materials at each time interval. The bevelled design of cavity allowed significantly less leakage than the unbevelled cavity. Overall, there was little difference between the various dentine bonding agents. The glass ionomer restorations showed significantly less leakage than the composite resin and dentine bonding agent combinations in unbevelled cavities.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

The effects of dentine bonding agents on marginal leakage of composite restorations – long‐term studies

Grieve

Saunders

Alani

1993

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…"Tooth flexure theory" is accepted as primary etiologic factor in wedge-shaped cervical erosion and Class V restoration retention failure [11]. However the placement technique, properties of bonding agents, polymerization shrinkage, marginal leakage etc are enlisted as other possible causes of restoration failure [12,13].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Air Abrasion Preconditioning on Microleakage in Class V Restorations Under Cyclic Loading: An In-vitro Study

Kumar

Dharmani

Singh

et al. 2014

JCDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Glass ionomer has been recommended as an effective intracanal barrier to prevent coronal microleakage. [12] It has demonstrated good sealing[16] and antibacterial properties. [17] Conventional glass ionomer cement (Fuji II) was chosen as an intracanal plug in Groups A1 and B1 as it has been found to have better sealing ability than resin-modified glass ionomer cement.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of intracanal sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims:The purpose of this study was to compare the sealing ability of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) and Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) when used over gutta-percha as intracanal sealing materials. The study also evaluated the sealing ability of Zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) cement and Acroseal sealer.Materials and Methods:Teeth were obturated with gutta-percha using sealer ZOE (group A, C, D) and Acroseal (group B). The groups were further divided into 2 subgroups (15 premolars each) on the basis of intracanal sealing material used: GIC subgroups (A1, B1) and MTA in subgroups (A2, B2). The clearing technique was used in this study for leakage evaluation. Seventy mandibular premolars were prepared using step-back technique and divided into experimental groups A and B (30 premolars each) and the positive and negative control groups C and D (5 premolars each).Statistical analysis used:Coronal microleakage was determined under stereomicroscope using 15X magnification. Data was statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Post-Hoc Multiple comparison (Bonferroni).Results:MTA group leaked significantly less than GIC group (P < 0.05). Acroseal exhibited better sealing ability than ZOE sealer. Teeth with no intracanal barrier showed almost complete leakage.Conclusions:MTA may be preferred over GIC as an intracanal barrier.

show abstract

Microleakage at the gingival wall with four Class V anterior restorative materials

Cited by 45 publications

References 4 publications

The effects of dentine bonding agents on marginal leakage of composite restorations – long‐term studies

The effects of dentine bonding agents on marginal leakage of composite restorations – long‐term studies

Effect of Air Abrasion Preconditioning on Microleakage in Class V Restorations Under Cyclic Loading: An In-vitro Study

Comparative evaluation of intracanal sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About