2020
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2020.24049.1020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microleakage of Cavity Class V Restored by Glass Ionomer Restorations in Primary Molars Conditioned by Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Versus Conventional method (An in Vitro Study)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in the present study, 10% polyacrylic acid was used to condition the surface of the cavity, which itself caused the partial demineralization of the dentin surface, which improved the penetration and diffusion of RMGIC to the intertubular spaces of the dentin and establishing a micromechanical bond to the dentin [33]; probably in this way, it has caused a reduction of the microleakage. However, this may not be the case with CGIC because the adhesion of CGIC which does not have a resin part to the dentin is chemical, and it can be estimated that the use of 10% polyacrylic acid has caused a decrease in the content of the minerals in the dentin, and, probably, it has a negative effect on the bond strength [34] and microleakage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, in the present study, 10% polyacrylic acid was used to condition the surface of the cavity, which itself caused the partial demineralization of the dentin surface, which improved the penetration and diffusion of RMGIC to the intertubular spaces of the dentin and establishing a micromechanical bond to the dentin [33]; probably in this way, it has caused a reduction of the microleakage. However, this may not be the case with CGIC because the adhesion of CGIC which does not have a resin part to the dentin is chemical, and it can be estimated that the use of 10% polyacrylic acid has caused a decrease in the content of the minerals in the dentin, and, probably, it has a negative effect on the bond strength [34] and microleakage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, it is necessary to mention that obtaining different results in different studies [31,32,34] regarding the comparison of the microleakage of CGIC and RMGIC could be due to the study design, materials used, quality of the substrates, location of the margins, and different measurement tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%