Abstract-Defibrillation shocks induce nonlinear changes of transmembrane potential (⌬V m ) that determine the outcome of defibrillation. As shown earlier, strong shocks applied during action potential plateau cause nonmonotonic negative ⌬V m , where an initial hyperpolarization is followed by V m shift to a more positive level. The biphasic negative ⌬V m can be attributable to (1) an inward ionic current or (2) membrane electroporation. These hypotheses were tested in cell cultures by measuring the effects of ionic channel blockers on ⌬V m and measuring uptake of membrane-impermeable dye. Experiments were performed in cell strands (width Ϸ0.8 mm) produced using a technique of patterned cell growth. Uniform-field shocks were applied during the action potential plateau, and ⌬V m was measured by optical mapping. Shock-induced negative ⌬V m exhibited a biphasic shape starting at a shock strength of Ϸ15 V/cm when estimated peak ⌬V Ϫ m was ϷϪ180 mV; positive ⌬V m remained monophasic. Application of a series of shocks with a strength of 23Ϯ1 V/cm resulted in uptake of membrane-impermeable dye propidium iodide. Dye uptake was restricted to the anodal side of strands with the largest negative ⌬V m , indicating the occurrence of membrane electroporation at these locations. The occurrence of biphasic negative ⌬V m was also paralleled with after-shock elevation of diastolic V m . Inhibition of I f and I K1 currents that are active at large negative potentials by CsCl and BaCl 2 , respectively, did not affect ⌬V m , indicating that these currents were not responsible for biphasic ⌬V m . These results provide evidence that the biphasic shape of ⌬V m at sites of shock-induced hyperpolarization is caused by membrane electroporation. Key Words: defibrillation Ⅲ fluorescent imaging Ⅲ membrane electroporation Ⅲ virtual electrodes Ⅲ secondary sources T he success or failure of defibrillation is determined by the magnitudes and the distribution patterns of shockinduced changes of transmembrane potential (⌬V m ), but the mechanisms governing the ⌬V m dynamics are not well understood. Experiments in cardiac tissue have shown that unlike in mathematical models, shocks produce strongly nonlinear V m responses. Shocks applied in the plateau phase of the action potential (AP) typically produce two basic types of nonlinear ⌬V m . The first type is characterized by a monotonic ⌬V m shape and an asymmetric distribution of ⌬V m magnitude, with the negative ⌬V m being much larger than positive ⌬V m . [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Stronger shocks induce ⌬V m of the second type, which is characterized by a nonmonotonic behavior of negative ⌬V m when strong hyperpolarization is followed by a positive V m shift. 4,5 In addition, the amplitudes of both positive and negative ⌬V m do not increase proportionally with increasing shock strength but reach saturation levels and then decrease. 1,5 Several studies investigated cellular and ionic mechanisms of nonlinear ⌬V m . It was found that the asymmetry of V m response was reduced by the application of nifedipi...