1995
DOI: 10.1016/1352-2310(95)00165-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micrometeorological measurement and source region analysis of nitrous oxide fluxes from an agricultural soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high-frequency damping mainly depended on the wind speed and ranged between 25% (low wind speed) and 55% (high wind speed). The detection limit of the EC fluxes was determined empirically from the standard deviation of the covariance function at large delay times according to Wienhold et al (1995). It was estimated on average to 0.3 nmol m −2 s −1 and 0.8 nmol m −2 s −1 for the measurements above the intensive and extensive field, respectively.…”
Section: Eddy Covariance Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high-frequency damping mainly depended on the wind speed and ranged between 25% (low wind speed) and 55% (high wind speed). The detection limit of the EC fluxes was determined empirically from the standard deviation of the covariance function at large delay times according to Wienhold et al (1995). It was estimated on average to 0.3 nmol m −2 s −1 and 0.8 nmol m −2 s −1 for the measurements above the intensive and extensive field, respectively.…”
Section: Eddy Covariance Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eddy covariance fluxes are usually estimated by maximising the cross-covariance between time series w and χ c . Wienhold et al (1995) developed a method to assess how well this maximum can be detected from the cross-covariance. In their method the detection limit of a flux is estimated as the standard deviation of the cross-covariance function values far from the maximum value, i.e.…”
Section: Random Errors In the Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the error of the flux determination, the standard deviation of the covariance of w and c was calculated using time lags in the region of 1 to 1.5 s and 7.5 to 8 s in 0.05 s intervals, which is far away from the time lag used for flux determination (∼4.5 s) and regarded as a background (Wienhold et al, 1995;Spirig et al, 2005;Brunner et al, 2007). As a mean value, the estimated error in the flux determination (2σ ) was found to be 25 µg C m −2 h −1 for isoprene and 19 µg C m −2 h −1 for methanol.…”
Section: Disjunct Eddy Covariance Technique (Dec)mentioning
confidence: 99%