2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ohx.2021.e00242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MicroMI: A portable microbiological mobile incubator that uses inexpensive lithium power banks for field microbiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst this may not provide the same standardized measure of antibiotic susceptibility of each individual strain present in the sample, it will be important to continue researching the link between "mixed MIC" found from direct susceptibility testing Our assay is simpler than many microfluidic devices, and the open source 3D-printed frame design is flexible and customizable. The system is compact, allowing mobile operation especially if combined with other portable microbiology tools such as mobile incubators [32]. Three-dimensional (3D) printing has become cheaper; we used 3D printers costing £200-£750 (Creality Ender 3 and Prusa i3 MK3) with the materials cost per frame dip slide significantly under £2 to determine simultaneously Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial identification plus two different antibiotics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whilst this may not provide the same standardized measure of antibiotic susceptibility of each individual strain present in the sample, it will be important to continue researching the link between "mixed MIC" found from direct susceptibility testing Our assay is simpler than many microfluidic devices, and the open source 3D-printed frame design is flexible and customizable. The system is compact, allowing mobile operation especially if combined with other portable microbiology tools such as mobile incubators [32]. Three-dimensional (3D) printing has become cheaper; we used 3D printers costing £200-£750 (Creality Ender 3 and Prusa i3 MK3) with the materials cost per frame dip slide significantly under £2 to determine simultaneously Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial identification plus two different antibiotics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dip frame is easy to use and can be easily transport to the field, with no extensive training or introduction to the user required. Combing the dip frame with our previously developed mobile incubator [32] will increase the portability of these tests for broader application, and it may reduce the turnaround time for samples taken a long way from microbiology testing labs. Finally, direct testing with 3D-printed dip slides may contribute to an alternative and rapid way to measure mixed microbes including the microbiome alongside pathogens and measure the antibiotic resistance profiles associated with complex mixtures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…† Increasingly, more designs for portable and affordable incubation for field microbiology have been developed. [52][53][54] Since the mcAST devices are low profile they can be effectively heated from below, without needing a large incubator volume. The incubation stage was prototyped using a heated bed designed for 3D printers, comprising a simple resistive heating element on a printed circuit board (PCB).…”
Section: Direct Poc-mcast Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…growth media) and grew the bacteria (for the motility studies); moreover, other materials (culture tubes, L-spreaders, paper disks) are purchased pre-sterilized. W ith mo re tim e, participants could harness lo wcost hardware for sterilization (e.g., pressure-cooker-based autoclaves (Tao et al ( 2012)), incubation and agitation (Diep et al (2021), Arumugam et al ( 2021)).…”
Section: Physics Of Living Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%