2012
DOI: 10.1080/10910344.2012.730848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micromilling in Minimum Quantity Lubrication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of the MQL system presented prominent efficiency regarding burr formation. It occurs because the use of MQL produces a minimum burr due to the absence of build-up edge or a thermochemical reaction, when compared to flood and dry machining [46]. However, it should be noted that, in the micro-milling of Inconel 718, dry and MQL conditions presented no significant difference as to burr formation [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of the MQL system presented prominent efficiency regarding burr formation. It occurs because the use of MQL produces a minimum burr due to the absence of build-up edge or a thermochemical reaction, when compared to flood and dry machining [46]. However, it should be noted that, in the micro-milling of Inconel 718, dry and MQL conditions presented no significant difference as to burr formation [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to Kajaria et al. [46], regarding the micro-droplet, only adhesion and centrifugal force are considered, neglecting the gravity effect and aerodynamic drag. If adhesion force is greater than centrifugal force, the micro-droplet adheres and spreads on the tool surface; otherwise, the micro-droplet separates from the tool surface due to a higher centrifugal force.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of conventional cutting fluid in milling process may not effectively control the heat generation. Micro milling of 316 L stainless steel under MQL was investigated by Kajaria et al (2012). The results showed that machining with LN 2 lowers cutting zone temperature, tool flank wear, surface roughness and cutting forces as compared with dry and wet machining.…”
Section: Milling Under Mql Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some major advantages of MQL include improved environment, better surface finish, increased tool life, reduced wear and damage at tool tips; reduce health hazards, and overall low costs in various micromachining processes. Machining processes using MQL have been studied for all conventional meso or micro machining processes like micro and meso scale drilling [2], [3] micro milling [4], [5], turning [6], [7] and grinding [8]. Implementing MQL in machining process helps to increase the tool life and produce better surface finish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, [9] studied the micro-milling using MQL with varying the cutting parameters and analyzed the tool performance and machined surface condition. The tool performance was analyzed by [5] and it showed that MQL increased the tool life by 100 times compared to dry machining. MQL Assisted Meso-scale milling has been studied by [10] and it was shown how that the use of compressed chilly air and nanofluid MQL is effective for improving surface finish and reducing machining force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%