2016
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201500318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microparticles manipulation and enhancement of their separation in pinched flow fractionation by insulator‐based dielectrophoresis

Abstract: The separation and manipulation of microparticles in lab on a chip devices have importance in point of care diagnostic tools and analytical applications. The separation and sorting of particles from biological and clinical samples can be performed using active and passive techniques. In passive techniques, no external force is applied while in active techniques by applying external force (e.g. electrical), higher separation efficiency is obtained. In this article, passive (pinched flow fractionation) and activ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, many microfluidic devices are designed for only one function, either isolation or identification. For example, many microfluidic DEP devices are solely designed for cell sorting which could be followed by an identification method not carried out within the study . On the other hand, many identification methods, such as Raman spectroscopy , PCR , or FTIR , already assume a sample free of debris, making them ill‐equipped to handle environmental or clinical samples which are bound to have debris.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, many microfluidic devices are designed for only one function, either isolation or identification. For example, many microfluidic DEP devices are solely designed for cell sorting which could be followed by an identification method not carried out within the study . On the other hand, many identification methods, such as Raman spectroscopy , PCR , or FTIR , already assume a sample free of debris, making them ill‐equipped to handle environmental or clinical samples which are bound to have debris.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particles were subsequently separated efficiently according to their size and density. Similarly, the separation gap between two particles in the PFF device can be further amplified by adding a dielectrophoretic field, which was demonstrated in a recent work for the separation of 1.5 and 6 μ m particles 134 . Although inertial force is usually unflavored in PFF, 46 Lu and Xuan 135 showed that the separation gap between particles was increased as inertia became stronger in their modified PFF device with an extensively elongated pinched segment (2 cm), and thus, better separation was achieved.…”
Section: Sorting By Pinched Flow Fractionationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…8 ). This mechanism is supported by the working principle of DEP—a technique that has been used to manipulate polarized particles suspended in fluid media in non-uniform electric field ( Khashei et al, 2015 ). In the case of a spherical particle, the DEP force F DEP is given by the equation below: Where the real part of Clausius–Mossotti factor, Re[ K (ω)], is defined as: Where R denotes the radius of the particle, ∇ E the magnitude of the electric field gradient, ε p * the complex permittivity of the particle, and ε m * that of the media.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%