2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microplastic contamination on the lower Chao Phraya: Abundance, characteristic and interaction with heavy metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possibility is to perform a double extraction of elements: (i) from an acidic leaching to determine which elements are labile and (ii) from an acidic digestion to determine total element concentrations. Numerous studies have determined total metals concentrations in plastics by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] , but this will be the first time for this joint approach consisting of coupling acidic leaching and digestion to ICP-MS or ICP-AES (atomic emission spectrometry) measurements. Our innovative approach aims to determine which elements are additive or adsorbed to the plastics, and their bioavailability to the biota.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility is to perform a double extraction of elements: (i) from an acidic leaching to determine which elements are labile and (ii) from an acidic digestion to determine total element concentrations. Numerous studies have determined total metals concentrations in plastics by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] , but this will be the first time for this joint approach consisting of coupling acidic leaching and digestion to ICP-MS or ICP-AES (atomic emission spectrometry) measurements. Our innovative approach aims to determine which elements are additive or adsorbed to the plastics, and their bioavailability to the biota.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some studies mention that PE and PP have a greater capacity to absorb hydrophobic organic pollutants than other polymers (Fotopoulou and Karapanagioti, 2012;Yamashita et al, 2019). Several studies consulted, PE and PP were reported as one of the predominant polymers in samples of seawater, freshwater, and sediments (Chen et al, 2020;Frias et al, 2010;Lo et al, 2019;Pannetier et al, 2019;Ta and Babel, 2020). Thus, the bioavailability of the pollutants sorbed onto PE and PP microplastics may be of public concern.…”
Section: Organic Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, lead (Pb) released from PVC affects the gene expression in zebrafish [63] . Moreover, microplastics would adsorb persistent organic pollutants (e.g., PCBs, PAHs, DDTs, and PBDEs) and heavy metals (e.g., Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Cd, and Zn) due to their larger specific surface area and hydrophobicity [64][65][66][67] thus increasing the toxicity of microplastics. At the same time, persistent organic pollutants and heavy metals can cause secretion disorders, mutations, and cancer in organisms.…”
Section: Impacts Of Microplastics On the Freshwater Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%