2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpro.2004.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microprocessor and FPGA interfaces for in-system co-debugging in field programmable hybrid systems

Abstract: Abstract.-New trends in technology require efficient control and processing platforms based on connected software-hardware subsystems. Due to their complexity and size, algorithms implemented on these platforms are difficult to test and verify. When these types of solution are being designed, it is necessary to provide information of the internal values of registers and memories of both the software and hardware during the execution of the complete system. The final architecture of the targeted design and its … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, [19] reports 916 seconds to inject 3000 bitflips in one FF and [17] reports 3.5 seconds needed for a FF fault injection in a Xilinx TM Virtex-II FPGA. Another interesting reconfiguration-based system is Fault Tolerant -University of Seville Hardware DEbugging System (FT-UNSHADES), which implements a read-modify-write approach [20], [21]. The reported time to inject and evaluate a fault is on the order of 100 ms (in this case, no information was found only for a single FF fault injection) and it uses the JTAG debugging port to this end.…”
Section: B Reconfiguration-based Fault Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, [19] reports 916 seconds to inject 3000 bitflips in one FF and [17] reports 3.5 seconds needed for a FF fault injection in a Xilinx TM Virtex-II FPGA. Another interesting reconfiguration-based system is Fault Tolerant -University of Seville Hardware DEbugging System (FT-UNSHADES), which implements a read-modify-write approach [20], [21]. The reported time to inject and evaluate a fault is on the order of 100 ms (in this case, no information was found only for a single FF fault injection) and it uses the JTAG debugging port to this end.…”
Section: B Reconfiguration-based Fault Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time is represented as an ordered set of stimuli that are injected into the FPGA, SEUs are inserted using a read-modify-write strategy of the configuration memory of the FPGA. This scheme is an application of the previous experience UNSHADES-1 and UNSHADES-2 [6][7]. This paper is organized as follows: first, we introduce to the SEU measurement problem.…”
Section: Introduction V Lsi Designs For Critical Industry Applicatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] These user-programmable solutions are capable of performing the hardware part of a design for a significantly lower price, and they maintain many of the advantages of the ASIC ͑application-specific integrated circuit͒ solutions. FPGA foundries offer many built-in circuit features, such as memory, multipliers, and high-speed communication links.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These devices were recently introduced into the market under the name of programmable system on a chip ͑PSoCs͒. 5 They have a digital programmable section, a microprocessor core, and a programmable analog tile all embedded into them, often together with other specialized modules for communications. As of the writing of this paper, the most modern and largest in size and performance are the E7V CSoC from Triscend, 19 Excalibur from Altera, 20 Virtex 4 from Xilinx, 21 and EPSLIC from Atmel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation