1998
DOI: 10.1017/s136794309800002x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity in fragmented South African buffalo populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
64
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
64
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The level of variation in the black‐faced impala is, however, comparable to that of cattle Bos taurus and Bos indicus (MacHugh et al . 1997), African buffalo populations Syncerus caffer (O’Ryan et al . 1998; Simonsen et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of variation in the black‐faced impala is, however, comparable to that of cattle Bos taurus and Bos indicus (MacHugh et al . 1997), African buffalo populations Syncerus caffer (O’Ryan et al . 1998; Simonsen et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid large numerical errors in calculating (2) and thus (7) for large genealogies (a sample of $100 sequences), I conduct computations using high precision of hundreds of significant digits (depending on sample size). An alternative option is to adopt a Markov chain Monte Carlo method proposed by Griffiths and Tavaré (1994) as in O'Ryan et al (1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R st is expected to be larger than F st when populations have evolved independently (e.g., low historical Nm between populations). On the other hand, when the values between R st and F st are nearly equal, Nm has been historically large between populations and drift has been the predominant factor in creating differences between populations, not mutation (Slatkin 1995;O'Ryan et al 1998). In this study, R st was lower than F st suggesting that (1) drift has been more important than mutation historically, and (2) Nm has been large.…”
Section: Current Versus Historical Gene Flowmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Unfortunately, migration rates calculated by these methods may be more reflective of historical migration than current migration (Whitlock and McCauley 1999), even when based on highly variable DNA markers such as microsatellites. Several authors have suggested ways to separate historical versus current gene flow (Slatkin 1995;O'Ryan et al 1998). We use these approaches, plus combined field and laboratory data to make inferences about current versus historical gene flow of kit fox in the San Joaquin Valley.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%