2000
DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.2000.3.3.145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microsatellite marker panels for use in high-throughput genotyping of mouse crosses

Abstract: Several microsatellite genotyping panel sets have been developed that are polymorphic between C57BL/6J and CAST/Ei mice, or C57BL/6J and DBA/2J. One set of markers for each strain pair has an intermarker distance of approximately 20 cM, and a second set has an intermarker distance of 5 cM. The 20-cM set contains 105 markers for C57BL/6J x DBA/2J and 108 for C57BL/6J x CAST/Ei, divided into 13 panels. Each 5-cM set includes 350 markers arranged into 45 panels. A panel contains a number of primer pairs whose flu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tail tips from parentals and F 1 and F 2 mice were digested with proteinase K and DNA precipitated with ethanol. Fluorescently labeled primers corresponding to 350 markers shown to be polymorphic between C57BL͞6Jand CAST͞Ei by Iakoubova et al (10) were tested to see whether they were also polymorphic between C57BL͞6J and CASA͞Rk, resulting in the identification of 255 markers that were used for genotyping in the current cross. The average spacing between these markers was 5.9 cM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tail tips from parentals and F 1 and F 2 mice were digested with proteinase K and DNA precipitated with ethanol. Fluorescently labeled primers corresponding to 350 markers shown to be polymorphic between C57BL͞6Jand CAST͞Ei by Iakoubova et al (10) were tested to see whether they were also polymorphic between C57BL͞6J and CASA͞Rk, resulting in the identification of 255 markers that were used for genotyping in the current cross. The average spacing between these markers was 5.9 cM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine whether these effects represented a global influence on X chromosome choice (regardless of Xce genotype), we used a QTL mapping strategy in a population of B6CASTF 2 Xce homozygotes and Xce heterozygotes. We genotyped 72 B6CASTF 2 Xce heterozygous and 28 B6CASTF 2 Xce homozygous females using a panel of microsatellite markers with 20 cM average spacing based on one developed previously (Iakoubova et al 2000). We identified a single major QTL (Figure 1) in this cross.…”
Section: Identification Of Major Genetic Influences On X Inactivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most molecular markers designed for such studies have been described for classical laboratory strains (Dietrich et al . 1996; Iakoubova et al . 2000) carrying a mixture of various mouse genomes (Wade et al .…”
Section: Panel Of Microsatellite Multiplexes (A) and The List Of Primmentioning
confidence: 99%