1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2230.1999.00487.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic Nikolsky's sign

Abstract: Nikolsky's sign is a useful clinical sign in patients with active pemphigus. It does not however, indicate the level of split in the skin, and is seldom present in partially-treated patients. The purpose of this study was two fold: (i) to document the microscopic or subclinical counterpart of clinical Nikolsky's sign; and (ii) to improve the diagnostic yield of routine histopathology in pemphigus patients in whom the lesions are infected/old and are therefore not useful for histopathology, and when intact blis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Thus, the subsequent mucocutaneous fragility contributes to a positive Nikolsky's sign, as previously demonstrated by microscopic modifications to the epidermis due to a tangential pressure. 7 In oral medicine, AMBDs may also clearly involve gingival mucosa, 8,9 and, as reported in our study, these lesions appeared as bullous and/or erosive in 46.5% of patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Thus, the subsequent mucocutaneous fragility contributes to a positive Nikolsky's sign, as previously demonstrated by microscopic modifications to the epidermis due to a tangential pressure. 7 In oral medicine, AMBDs may also clearly involve gingival mucosa, 8,9 and, as reported in our study, these lesions appeared as bullous and/or erosive in 46.5% of patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Thus, the subsequent mucocutaneous fragility contributes to a positive Nikolsky's sign, as previously demonstrated by microscopic modifications to the epidermis due to a tangential pressure 7 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This is a useful sign in patients with old/infected blisters, no fresh/intact blisters, or when no facility of immunofluorescence is available in the hospital. [8]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision should ideally include the elicitation of Dry, wet or microscopic Nikolskys sign, DIF findings and antibody levels by IIF at the end of phase I, II and III. [171819]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%