2012
DOI: 10.7567/jjap.51.06fd06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic Raman Mapping of Epitaxial Graphene on 4H-SiC(0001)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Raman microprobe mapping has proven to be a useful tool for identification of inhomogeneities within epitaxial graphene. 43,44 For instance Ryong-Sok and co-workers have been able to map bi-layered and multilayered-graphene domains on a 4H-SiC (0001) surface that is predominantly covered with monolayer graphene. 43 Several groups have been able to use the FWHM and peak positions of the 2D and G bands to evaluate crystal quality and to map compressive strain across the epitaxial graphene domains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Raman microprobe mapping has proven to be a useful tool for identification of inhomogeneities within epitaxial graphene. 43,44 For instance Ryong-Sok and co-workers have been able to map bi-layered and multilayered-graphene domains on a 4H-SiC (0001) surface that is predominantly covered with monolayer graphene. 43 Several groups have been able to use the FWHM and peak positions of the 2D and G bands to evaluate crystal quality and to map compressive strain across the epitaxial graphene domains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43,44 For instance Ryong-Sok and co-workers have been able to map bi-layered and multilayered-graphene domains on a 4H-SiC (0001) surface that is predominantly covered with monolayer graphene. 43 Several groups have been able to use the FWHM and peak positions of the 2D and G bands to evaluate crystal quality and to map compressive strain across the epitaxial graphene domains. Figure 8 depicts a topographical AFM map alongside co-localized Raman maps of the G (integrated between 1590 and 1630 cm À1 ) and D (between 1275 and 1450 cm À1 ) band spectral windows acquired for the same region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows Raman spectra of a sample before and after UV light irradiation for 3 h. We measured the Raman spectra of the epitaxially grown graphene after UV light irradiation at the focal point where the intensity was maximum (about 50 mW/cm 2 ) and subtracted the SiC-related background in the spectra. [19][20][21][22] No significant change in D peak intensity (³1350 cm ¹1 ), which originates from defects in graphene sheets, [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]23,24) was observed. Thus, we confirmed that no defects were formed in the epitaxially grown graphene on SiC immersed in aqueous KOH (1 wt %) upon irradiation with strong UV light.…”
Section: Effect Of Uv Light On Epitaxially Grown Graphene On Sicmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The sample was identified using an atomic force microscope (AFM) and a Raman spectroscope. 22) The sample was covered with singlelayer graphene and was homogeneous on the scale of the wafer. For the probes, we used the Ecopia SPCB-01; we used a Keithley 2430 as the measurement instrument and a pair of neodymium magnets to apply the magnetic field.…”
Section: Hall Voltagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annealing condition is 10 min at 1620 °C under a pressure of 100 Torr in an argon atmosphere. The sample was identified using an atomic force microscope (AFM) and a Raman spectroscope 22). The sample was covered with singlelayer graphene and was homogeneous on the scale of the wafer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%