2006
DOI: 10.1080/00071660601084390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microsomal and cytosolic biotransformation of aflatoxin B1 in four poultry species

Abstract: 1. This research evaluated differences in hepatic in vitro metabolism of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) on selected avian species. 2. Microsomal and cytosolic liver fractions were obtained from chickens, ducks, quails and turkeys; eight males and eight females of each. 3. All microsomes studied produced AFB1-8,9-exo-epoxide (AFBO), a metabolite regarded as the active product of AFB1. Turkey microsomes produced 1.8 and 3.5 times more AFBO than quails and chickens microsomes, respectively. 4. Males from evaluated birds pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The compounds were separated using a linear gradient of A (waterÁ0.1% formic acid) and B (methanolÁ0.1% formic acid) as follows: 0 min, 30% B; 2 min, 30% B; 7 min, 55% B; and 7.01 min, 30% B. The two analytes were monitored by fluorescence detection at excitation and emission wavelengths of 365 nm and 425 nm, respectively (Gallagher et al, 1996;Lozano & Diaz, 2006). A 1:100 dilution was made, from which 2 ml was injected into the chromatograph.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The compounds were separated using a linear gradient of A (waterÁ0.1% formic acid) and B (methanolÁ0.1% formic acid) as follows: 0 min, 30% B; 2 min, 30% B; 7 min, 55% B; and 7.01 min, 30% B. The two analytes were monitored by fluorescence detection at excitation and emission wavelengths of 365 nm and 425 nm, respectively (Gallagher et al, 1996;Lozano & Diaz, 2006). A 1:100 dilution was made, from which 2 ml was injected into the chromatograph.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AFB1 and AFBO determination was carried out at 408C, at a flow rate of 0.35 ml/min. The AFBO production was monitored as the AFB1Ádhd adduct, which was quantitated using AFB2a as standard (given the similar spectral properties of AFB1-dhd and AFB2a), as described by Lozano & Diaz (2006). The compounds were separated using a linear gradient of A (waterÁ0.1% formic acid) and B (methanolÁ0.1% formic acid) as follows: 0 min, 30% B; 2 min, 30% B; 7 min, 55% B; and 7.01 min, 30% B.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results also confirm that the differences in sensitivity to AFB1 among poultry species can be partially explained by differences in the relative enzymatic properties of the CYP avian orthologs responsible for AFB1 bioactivation. 35 This study also shows that the turkey liver microsomes are the most efficient bioactivating AFB1 to AFBO, followed by quail, duck and chicken enzymes. In order to completely understand how AFB1 is biotransformed in avian species and how metabolism determines in vivo sensitivity it is necessary to further investigate phase I and specially phase II metabolism of AFB1 in poultry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This reaction is not catalyzed by microsomal enzymes but by a cytosolic NADPH-dependent enzyme that in the case of the chicken has an estimated molecular weight of 46.5 KDa and is inhibited by the 17-ketosteroids androsterone, dehydroisoandrosterone and estrone (Chen et al, 1981). Formation of AFL was first reported in chicken, duck, turkey and rabbit liver cytosol (Patterson & Roberts, 1971), and it also occurs in quail (Lozano & Diaz, 2006). However, little or no activity has been observed in guinea pig, mouse or rat liver cytosol (Patterson & Roberts, 1971).…”
Section: Reduction Of Aflatoxin B1mentioning
confidence: 99%