2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10909-014-1174-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MicroSQUID Force Microscopy in a Dilution Refrigerator

Abstract: We present a new generation of a scanning MicroSQUID microscope operating in an inverted dilution refrigerator. The MicroSQUIDs have a size of 1.21 µm 2 and a magnetic flux sensitivity of 120 µΦ 0 / √ Hz and thus a field sensitivity of 550 µG/ √ Hz. The scan range at low temperatures is about 80 µm and a coarse displacement of 5 mm in x and y direction has been implemented.The MicroSQUID-to-sample distance is regulated using a tuning fork based force detection. A MicroSQUID-to-sample distance of 420 nm has bee… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to conventional two-terminal/two-junction SQUIDs that display optimal sensitivity when flux biased to about a quarter of the flux quantum, the additional terminals and junctions allow optimal sensitivity at arbitrary applied flux, thus eliminating the magnetic field "blind spots". We demonstrate spin sensitivity of 5 to 8 µ B /Hz 1/2 over a continuous field range of 0 to 0.5 T, with promising applications for nanoscale scanning magnetic imaging.KEYWORDS: superconducting quantum interference device, SQUID on tip, nanoscale magnetic imaging, current-phase relations 2 In recent years, there has been a growing effort to develop and apply nanoscale magnetic imaging tools in order to address the rapidly evolving fields of nanomagnetism and spintronics.These include magnetic force microscopy (MFM) 1,2 , magnetic resonance force microscopy (MRFM) [3][4][5] , nitrogen vacancy (NV) centers sensors [6][7][8][9] , scanning Hall probe microscopy (SHPM) 10-12 , x-ray magnetic microscopy (XRM) 13 , and micro-or nano-superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] based scanning microscopy (SSM) [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] . Scanning micro-and nanoscale SQUIDs are of particular interest for magnetic imaging due to their high sensitivity and large bandwidth 15,19 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to conventional two-terminal/two-junction SQUIDs that display optimal sensitivity when flux biased to about a quarter of the flux quantum, the additional terminals and junctions allow optimal sensitivity at arbitrary applied flux, thus eliminating the magnetic field "blind spots". We demonstrate spin sensitivity of 5 to 8 µ B /Hz 1/2 over a continuous field range of 0 to 0.5 T, with promising applications for nanoscale scanning magnetic imaging.KEYWORDS: superconducting quantum interference device, SQUID on tip, nanoscale magnetic imaging, current-phase relations 2 In recent years, there has been a growing effort to develop and apply nanoscale magnetic imaging tools in order to address the rapidly evolving fields of nanomagnetism and spintronics.These include magnetic force microscopy (MFM) 1,2 , magnetic resonance force microscopy (MRFM) [3][4][5] , nitrogen vacancy (NV) centers sensors [6][7][8][9] , scanning Hall probe microscopy (SHPM) 10-12 , x-ray magnetic microscopy (XRM) 13 , and micro-or nano-superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] based scanning microscopy (SSM) [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] . Scanning micro-and nanoscale SQUIDs are of particular interest for magnetic imaging due to their high sensitivity and large bandwidth 15,19 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanning micro-and nanoscale SQUIDs are of particular interest for magnetic imaging due to their high sensitivity and large bandwidth 15,19 . The two main technological approaches to the fabrication of scanning SQUIDs are based on planar lithographic methods 21,26,[33][34][35][36] and on self-aligned SQUIDon-tip (SOT) deposition 22,24,37 .In the planar SQUID architecture, spatial resolution is limited but pickup and modulation coils can be integrated to allow operation of the SQUID at optimal flux bias conditions using a fluxlocked loop (FLL) feedback mechanism 15,18,19,21,33,38,39 . Because the magnetic field of the sample is not coupled to the SQUID loop directly, but rather through a pickup coil, integration of a modulation coil or an integrated current-carrying element 15,19,21,33,38,39 allows the total flux in the SQUID loop to be maintained at its optimal bias while the magnetic field of the sample is varied independently.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our measurements were made with a high-resolution scanning SQUID microscope (SSM) working in a dilution refrigerator [18,19]. The microscope combines tuning fork based scanning force microscopy and magnetic microscopy using a μ-SQUID scanning parallel to the sample surface.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 K 73 . Very recently, in a modified setup, a SQUIDto-sample distance of 420 nm has been demonstrated, in a setup with 40 mK base temperature 157 . The SSM system of the Grenoble group has been applied to the investigation of basic properties of superconductors.…”
Section: Nanosquids For Scanning Squid Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%