2013
DOI: 10.1097/wco.0b013e3283633714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural and network abnormalities in headache

Abstract: Owing to novel neuroimaging approaches and evaluation methods, a range of possibilities for exploring brain differences between migraine patients and healthy subjects have become available. These include both regional structural alterations and network connectivity changes. Despite methodological advances, most studies involve still small populations and results are often inconclusive. Future work should clearly involve larger cohorts and combine different techniques to help us better understand the diagnostic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a recent study has revealed a higher sensitivity of surface‐based methods in the detection of structural changes in regions involved in EF in patients with migraine compared with HC. However, we believe that the discrepancies among previous morphological studies may be attributed to different factors, including patients sample size, analytic tools, and statistical methods …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, a recent study has revealed a higher sensitivity of surface‐based methods in the detection of structural changes in regions involved in EF in patients with migraine compared with HC. However, we believe that the discrepancies among previous morphological studies may be attributed to different factors, including patients sample size, analytic tools, and statistical methods …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Consistent with our previous study, the decreased ECN functional connectivity is not correlated to GM atrophy or WM abnormalities. It is well known that some studies have supported migraine association with morphological abnormalities likely correlated to migraine subtypes and disease severity . In particular, Schmitz et al have shown a significant correlation between slow executive response and reduced frontal and parietal lobe GM density in a group of patients including both MwoA and MwA .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, several studies have found associations between the presence of pain disorders and atypical cortical thickness, including several migraine studies. [42], [43], [44], [45], [46] It is possible that aberrant cortical thickness of pain sensing and pain modulating regions determines sensitivity to somatosensory stimuli and thus predefines a person's pain perception in terms of pain thresholds, pain intensity and/or pain unpleasantness. [47] Alternatively, recurrent pain might lead to alterations in cortical thickness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found overall comparable prevalence of white matter lesions in both CH patient (37%) and control (32%) groups. These numbers are higher than most of the previous reports [for reviews, see Hougaard et al, 2014;Kruit et al, 2004Kruit et al, , 2005, which primarily employed 1.5T MRI and computed tomography images in the analysis [Eller and Goadsby, 2013;Ellerbrock et al, 2013]. We Widely distributed CT abnormality in CLBP relative to CON CLBP groups (49 pairs).…”
Section: Table II Cortical Regions Showed Significantly Differences mentioning
confidence: 73%