2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural and optoelectronic properties of polycrystalline InP films deposited by RF magnetron sputtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The similar results are presented in reference [4,5]. In order to increase the stoichiometry ratio (~50%atoms of P and ~50%atoms of In) we use two methods:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The similar results are presented in reference [4,5]. In order to increase the stoichiometry ratio (~50%atoms of P and ~50%atoms of In) we use two methods:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Similarly, the sharpness observed in the interference fringes of stacked layers selenized at 300, 350 and 400 °C indicates a decrease of surface roughness with improvement in the film crystallinity [39]. A low transmittance (less than 10%) was observed for stacked layers selenized at a temperature of 450 °C due to the poor crystallinity [40]. The appearance of maxima and minima in reflectance spectra indicates the specular nature of selenized thin films, thus revealing negligible possibility of scattering [41].…”
Section: Surface Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, the highest quality devices are all generated via wafer bonding and epitaxial transfer approaches. Direct growth approaches often suffer from low material quality due to the formation of nanocrystalline materials or defects if grown on highly mismatched substrates. Most monolithic material integration schemes for back-end compatible materials result in polycrystalline films with maximum reported mobilities on the order of 100 cm 2 /(V s). Templated liquid phase (TLP) growth has been shown to be a promising route toward growth of crystalline semiconductors on nonepitaxial substrates, overcoming the limitations of standard vapor phase growth techniques with typical mobilities 2–5 times higher than other monolithic integration schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%