1984
DOI: 10.1680/geot.1984.34.3.293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural changes associated with thixotropic phenomena in clay soils

Abstract: Thixotropic phenomena in clay soils are accompanied by microstructural changes. The nature of these changes is unclear because of the short duration of the thixotropic processes and the difficulties involved in preparing a specimen at certain stages. However, these technological problems were overcome and SEM photographs were obtained of the thixotropic soil microstructure during deformation of samples in a rotary viscometer with and without vibration. The new data obtained clarify the mechanism of thixotropic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This kind of friction and interlocking also depends on the grain orientation and mode of intergranular shearing (shear mode, Tika et al, 1996). Many studies have been made of the rate effect on residual shear strength of soils (Petley, 1966;Kenney, 1977;Lupini et al, 1981;Osipov et al, 1984;Lemos, 1986;Tika, 1989;Tika et al, 1996;Suzuki et al, 2004;Saito et al, 2007) and three types of variation of the residual strength with increase of shear displacement rate have been recognized: the residual shear strength (a) increases (positive rate effect), (b) decreases (negative rate effect), and (c) does not change (neutral rate effect). Two hypotheses have been proposed to explain the mechanism of shear-ratedependent residual shear strength of clayey soils, namely (a) excess pore water pressure is produced due to the changing shear rate, which changes effective normal stress and results in changing residual shear strength (The Japanese Geotechnical Society 1987), and (b) the shear mode varies with the shear rate and causes the internal friction angle of soils to change (Skempton, 1985;Tika et al, 1996;Saito et al,2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of friction and interlocking also depends on the grain orientation and mode of intergranular shearing (shear mode, Tika et al, 1996). Many studies have been made of the rate effect on residual shear strength of soils (Petley, 1966;Kenney, 1977;Lupini et al, 1981;Osipov et al, 1984;Lemos, 1986;Tika, 1989;Tika et al, 1996;Suzuki et al, 2004;Saito et al, 2007) and three types of variation of the residual strength with increase of shear displacement rate have been recognized: the residual shear strength (a) increases (positive rate effect), (b) decreases (negative rate effect), and (c) does not change (neutral rate effect). Two hypotheses have been proposed to explain the mechanism of shear-ratedependent residual shear strength of clayey soils, namely (a) excess pore water pressure is produced due to the changing shear rate, which changes effective normal stress and results in changing residual shear strength (The Japanese Geotechnical Society 1987), and (b) the shear mode varies with the shear rate and causes the internal friction angle of soils to change (Skempton, 1985;Tika et al, 1996;Saito et al,2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous hypotheses advanced to explain the low strengths observed in soils in ®eld and laboratory include mechanical¯uidization (Bagnold 1954; Howard, 1973;Hsu, 1975;Koerner, 1977;McSaveney 1978), frictional heating (Romero & Molina, 1974;Habib, 1975;Anderson 1980;Voight & Faust, 1982 and liquefaction (Terzaghi, 1956;Seed, 1968;Casagrande, 1975;Hutchinson, 1986), as well as those considering the rheological properties of the materials involved, such as thixotropy and the microstructural changes associated with it (Seed & Chan 1957;Mitchell, 1960;Kerr & Drew, 1968;Osipov et al, 1984), and the strength drop due to cyclic loading (Stark & Duncan, 1992). Consideration of all the observations on the behaviour of soils showing a negative rate effect suggests that the following mechanism may apply.…”
Section: Hypothesis To Explain Strength Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5a), the clay particles tend to aggregate and accumulate on the surface of sand grains or at the contact points of sand particles, forming a bridge-like structure bonding the grains to each other. Such particle arrangements produce significant pore spaces, Osipov et al (1984) and Gratchev et al (2006b),, who reported that lowstrength ''clay bridges'' at the contact points of sand grains were easily destroyed during cyclic loading, destabilizing the whole structure. It is likely that for B7 the destruction of ''clay bridges'' during cyclic loading was the trigger for rapid liquefaction.…”
Section: The Effects Of Bentonite Content On the Cyclic Behavior Of Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that work, the greater loss of cyclic shear strength under a higher loading frequency was attributed to the thixotropic nature of the studied soil. Thixotropy, a process of bond restoration resulting in some strength recovery, has been well-studied (Mitchell 1960;Osipov et al 1984;Barnes 1997). It was found that thixotropic recovery was time-consuming and increased when the time interval between loading cycles also increased.…”
Section: Shear Displacement-controlled (Sdc) Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%