2016
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/118/1/012016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural characterisation of interfaces in magnetic pulse welded aluminum/aluminum joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a first step to evaluate our hypothesis that part of the material in the jet can indeed be trapped in the magnetic pulse welding weld interface, we Although discharge energy (E = 16 kJ) and acceleration gap (d = 1.5 mm) were the same, the difference between both weld seams is significant. While the compound manufactured at normal pressure shows a pronounced porous interlayer (similar to previous reports [3]), there is no such layer in the low pressure sample. Note that the main difference between both experiments is that the jet can reach much higher velocities in low pressure environments compared to normal ambient pressure [17].…”
Section: Influence Of Ambient Pressure On the Microstructure Of Alumisupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a first step to evaluate our hypothesis that part of the material in the jet can indeed be trapped in the magnetic pulse welding weld interface, we Although discharge energy (E = 16 kJ) and acceleration gap (d = 1.5 mm) were the same, the difference between both weld seams is significant. While the compound manufactured at normal pressure shows a pronounced porous interlayer (similar to previous reports [3]), there is no such layer in the low pressure sample. Note that the main difference between both experiments is that the jet can reach much higher velocities in low pressure environments compared to normal ambient pressure [17].…”
Section: Influence Of Ambient Pressure On the Microstructure Of Alumisupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Compared to previously investigated interfaces in aluminum/aluminum joints [13], the aluminum/ steel welds show a much more complex interface structure, Figure 2. The different brightness levels in the backscatter electron micrograph show several discrete phases present within the weld seam.…”
Section: Interface Microstructure In Aluminum/steel Jointsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sharafiev et al reported sharp boundaries between the base materials and an intermediate layer of impact welded A-Al joints. New, recrystallized grains in the size of nanometers and high dislocation densities give evidence for melting and rapid solidification [11]. Amorphous structures have also been described by metallurgists [12,13] that can be attributed to solidification with cooling rates in the order of 10 7 K/s [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Sharafiev et al [22] studied the interface microstructure of MPW of Al/Al joints; the interface displayed a wavy weld geometry. The created transitional layer consists of ultrafine grains and, in some regions, exhibits a columnar grain structure, and it is suggested that the microstructure was generated by rapid melting and solidification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%