2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(00)00394-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural development in an ultrafine cement — Part II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particle size distribution of P.O 42.5′ and P.O 52.5′ clinkers are similar to those of P.O 42.5 and P.O 52.5 cement, respectively. The average particle size (X av = 2.763 μm) and the maximum particle size (X max = 10.825 μm) of SC clinker completely meet the technical requirements of superfine cement (X av < 5 μm, X max < 10.825 μm) [ 39 ]. Therefore, the materials used in the subsequent tests are P.O 42.5′, P.O 52.5′, and SC, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Particle size distribution of P.O 42.5′ and P.O 52.5′ clinkers are similar to those of P.O 42.5 and P.O 52.5 cement, respectively. The average particle size (X av = 2.763 μm) and the maximum particle size (X max = 10.825 μm) of SC clinker completely meet the technical requirements of superfine cement (X av < 5 μm, X max < 10.825 μm) [ 39 ]. Therefore, the materials used in the subsequent tests are P.O 42.5′, P.O 52.5′, and SC, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing studies [ 39 , 40 ] have shown that the utilization of superfine cement can exceed 80%. Shondeep L. Sarkar [ 41 ] pointed out two main drawbacks of refined cement particles, namely, late strength regression and faster setting time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%