2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4916725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure evolution of Al-doped zinc oxide and Sn-doped indium oxide deposited by radio-frequency magnetron sputtering: A comparison

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inCarrier mobility of highly transparent conductive Al-doped ZnO polycrystalline films deposited by radio-frequency, direct-current, and radio-frequency-superimposed direct-current magnetron sputtering: Grain boundary effect and scattering in the grain bulk J. Appl. Phys. 117, 045304 (2015); 10.1063/1.4906353Correlations between 1/f noise and thermal treatment of Al-doped ZnO thin films deposited by direct current sputtering Morphology and structure evolution of tin-doped indium … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned in the previous section, thickness dependence of electrical properties is one of the main limitations of using AZO films. The high resistivity of very thin films was investigated by several authors . It is often related to the existence of the thin interfacial layer, which does not contribute to the film conductivity.…”
Section: The Thickness Dependence Of Electrical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As mentioned in the previous section, thickness dependence of electrical properties is one of the main limitations of using AZO films. The high resistivity of very thin films was investigated by several authors . It is often related to the existence of the thin interfacial layer, which does not contribute to the film conductivity.…”
Section: The Thickness Dependence Of Electrical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Look et al proposed a mobility model described by the equation: μtrue(bolddtrue)=μ1+bold-italicd*dδd where d is the thickness, δd is the thickness of the depleted layer and d * is a function of n , μtrue(true). Nie et al fitted the dependence of the resistivity ρ ( d ) on the thickness d using the Fuchs‐Sondheimer model (F‐S model) according to the Equation: ρtrue(dtrue)=ρtrue(1+3letrue(1ptrue)8true(dd0true)true) where ρ the bulk resistivity, l e is the mean free electron path, and p is the diffuse reflection coefficient at the surface and interface, respectively. Both models assume a non‐conductive layer with thickens δd or d 0 , bulk mobility μ and volume resistivity ρ.…”
Section: The Thickness Dependence Of Electrical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The AZO is considered to be a cheap and non‐toxic candidate to replace the most used indium thin oxide, as high transparency and the lowest resistivity in the range of 2–4 × 10 −4 Ω · cm can be achieved . However, it is still difficult to obtain such good electrical properties on thermally sensitive substrates, as the optimal deposition temperature is about 300 °C . The preparation of AZO films at temperatures up to 100 °C is very important for applications in the field of flexible electronics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%