2002
DOI: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020603)41:11<1863::aid-anie1863>3.0.co;2-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave-Assisted Reactions in Organic Synthesis—Are There Any Nonthermal Microwave Effects?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
125
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
125
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Heating with microwave was more efficient in terms of energy, homogen temperature and short time. Therefore, the main advantages of using the microwave were very short reaction time and high yield [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heating with microwave was more efficient in terms of energy, homogen temperature and short time. Therefore, the main advantages of using the microwave were very short reaction time and high yield [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "thermal" effects refer to interactions resulting in increased random motion of particles (e.g., atoms, molecules, ions, or electrons) where the kinetic energy statistics of such fluctuations are represented by a single thermodynamic equilibrium distribution (i.e., Maxwell-Boltzmann, Bose-Einstein, or Fermi-Dirac). "Non-thermal" effects refer to interactions resulting in non-equilibrium energy fluctuation distributions or deterministic, time-averaged drift motion of matter (or both) (Kuhnert, 2002;Booske et al, 1997). This provides the molecule collision under microwave irradiation extra driving force compared to that under conventional heating, which results in higher rate of reaction under mmicrowave irradiation as long as the enzyme is not deactivated by microwave.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility of nonthermal effect of microwaves on the different processes and substances, despite the considerable amount of experimental work, is the subject of lively debate recently [2,5,6]. The mechanism of this influence is not entirely clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%